Cited by 643Evolution and Genetic DynamicsDNA Repair MechanismsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Mutation as a Stress Response and the Regulation of Evolvability

Open access
Galhardo, Rodrigo S., Hastings, P. J., Rosenberg, Susan M.·2007·Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Abstract

Our concept of a stable genome is evolving to one in which genomes are plastic and responsive to environmental changes. Growing evidence shows that a variety of environmental stresses induce genomic instability in bacteria, yeast, and human cancer cells, generating occasional fitter mutants and potentially accelerating adaptive evolution. The emerging molecular mechanisms of stress-induced mutagenesis vary but share telling common components that underscore two common themes. The first is the regulation of mutagenesis in time by cellular stress responses, which promote random mutations specifically when cells are poorly adapted to their environments, i.e., when they are stressed. A second theme is the possible restriction of random mutagenesis in genomic space, achieved via coupling of mutation-generating machinery to local events such as DNA-break repair or transcription. Such localization may minimize accumulation of deleterious mutations in the genomes of rare fitter mutants, and promote local concerted evolution. Although mutagenesis induced by stresses other than direct damage to DNA was previously controversial, evidence for the existence of various stress-induced mutagenesis programs is now overwhelming and widespread. Such mechanisms probably fuel evolution of microbial pathogenesis and antibiotic-resistance, and tumor progression and chemotherapy resistance, all of which occur under stress, driven by mutations. The emerging commonalities in stress-induced-mutation mechanisms provide hope for new therapeutic interventions for all of these processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10409230701648502

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 209 · Cited by 643

Authors
Galhardo, R. S., Hastings, P. J., & Rosenberg, S. M.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Published
2007-01
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
399-435
ISSN
  • 0045-6411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1040-9238
  • 1549-7798
OpenAlex
W2147101023
Cited by
643
References
209
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM53158, R01GM064022, R01GM053158, R01-GM64022)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
stress-induced mutagenesis, genomic instability, evolvability, genome plasticity, environmental stress response, adaptive evolution, DNA repair, deleterious mutation accumulation, antibiotic resistance, microbial pathogenesis, tumor progression, chemoresistance
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Animals, DNA Damage, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Escherichia coli, Humans, Mutation, SOS Response, Genetics, Transcription, Genetic, Mutagenesis, Evolution, Molecular, Interspersed Repetitive Sequences, Genomic Instability, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review