The incredible years parent program for Chinese preschoolers with developmental disabilities
Abstract
Research Findings: The objective of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of Incredible Years Basic Parent Training (IYPT Basic) in a community clinic setting in Hong Kong. IYPT Basic is a Western program developed to promote children’s academic, social, and emotional regulation skills and to reduce conduct problems among typically developing children. The program has not been tested in non-Western cultures, where the challenges for parents of children with developmental disabilities can be different. The IYPT Basic was adapted slightly to accommodate cultural characteristics in Hong Kong. Parents of 52 preschoolers with developmental disabilities were randomly assigned to either the IYPT Basic or a waitlist control. Parent and child dyads were assessed before and after the 12-week intervention/waitlist period via self-reports and spouse/kin reports and videotape coding by observers blind to the intervention/waitlist status. Significant intervention benefits included (a) increase in positive and reciprocal parent –child interaction, (b) reduction in parental stress, and (c) decrease in oppositional behavior among the children. The parents’ attendance, satisfaction, and homework compliance was high. Practice or Policy: IYPT Basic, when implemented with cultural sensitivity, can be effective for —and well received by—Chinese parents of preschoolers with developmental disabilities in a community setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies show a reduction in parental stress via therapist-led parent-training programs for parents of children with ASD or IDD, as well as self-directed interventions for parents of children displaying CB.
“While this finding is inconsistent with studies showing a reduction in parental stress via therapist-led parent-training programs for parents of children with ASD (63–65) or IDD (66, 67), as well as self-directed interventions for parents of children displaying CB (68, 69)”
Previous research on parent training programs for parents of children with ASD or IDD consistently revealed a reduction in CB after the intervention.
“This result is in line with previous research on parent training programs for parents of children with ASD (63, 64, 71) or IDD (66, 67, 74), which consistently revealed a reduction in CB after the intervention.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Kong, M. M.-Y., & Au, T. K.-F.
- Affiliations
- The Child Development Centre, Hong Kong
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Kong, Maureen Mo-yee
- Venue
- Early Education and Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-05-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 494-514
- ISSN
- 1040-9289 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6935
- OpenAlex
- W2801259186
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Early Education and Development (publishedVersion)
- Hong Kong Education Bibliographic Database (submittedVersion)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- developmental disabilities, preschool children, Chinese parents, cultural adaptation, parent-child interaction, parental stress, oppositional behavior, conduct problems, Hong Kong
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review