Cited by 19Behavioral and Psychological StudiesFamily and Disability Support ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The incredible years parent program for Chinese preschoolers with developmental disabilities

Kong, Maureen Mo-yee, Au, Terry Kit-fong·2018·Early Education and Development

Abstract

Research Findings: The objective of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of Incredible Years Basic Parent Training (IYPT Basic) in a community clinic setting in Hong Kong. IYPT Basic is a Western program developed to promote children’s academic, social, and emotional regulation skills and to reduce conduct problems among typically developing children. The program has not been tested in non-Western cultures, where the challenges for parents of children with developmental disabilities can be different. The IYPT Basic was adapted slightly to accommodate cultural characteristics in Hong Kong. Parents of 52 preschoolers with developmental disabilities were randomly assigned to either the IYPT Basic or a waitlist control. Parent and child dyads were assessed before and after the 12-week intervention/waitlist period via self-reports and spouse/kin reports and videotape coding by observers blind to the intervention/waitlist status. Significant intervention benefits included (a) increase in positive and reciprocal parent –child interaction, (b) reduction in parental stress, and (c) decrease in oppositional behavior among the children. The parents’ attendance, satisfaction, and homework compliance was high. Practice or Policy: IYPT Basic, when implemented with cultural sensitivity, can be effective for —and well received by—Chinese parents of preschoolers with developmental disabilities in a community setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10409289.2018.1461987

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 19

Authors
Kong, M. M.-Y., & Au, T. K.-F.
Affiliations
  • The Child Development Centre, Hong Kong
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Kong, Maureen Mo-yee
Venue
Early Education and Development
Published
2018-05-09
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
494-514
ISSN
  • 1040-9289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6935
OpenAlex
W2801259186
Cited by
19
References
65
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Education and Development (publishedVersion)
  • Hong Kong Education Bibliographic Database (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
developmental disabilities, preschool children, Chinese parents, cultural adaptation, parent-child interaction, parental stress, oppositional behavior, conduct problems, Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review