Cited by 83Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityPlant chemical constituents analysisInsect Pest Control Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Variety and Ontogenic Stage on the Essential Oil Composition and Biological Activity of Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.)

Abstract

The essential oils obtained from three varieties of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. (dulce, vulgare and azoricum) harvested at three ontogenic stages (early, late waxy and ripe seed) were evaluated for their chemical composition and biological activity. (E)-anethole, limonene and fenchone contents were greatly influenced by the varieties and by the harvesting times. The antibacterial activity of the various oils against 25 microorganisms was evaluated. The inhibition of Aeromonas hydrophila, Alcaligenes faecalis and Clostridium sporogenes was of particular interest and there was a marked antifungal potency against Aspergillus niger.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10412905.1994.9698325

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Vergese J., 1988, Indian Cocoa, Arecanut Spices J., 2, 39
  2. Duke, J. A. 1985.Handbook of Medicinal Herbs, 198–199. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  3. Morris J. A., 1979, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc, 5, 595, 10.1007/BF02660245 · DOI
  4. Shukla H. S., 1989, Agronomie, 9, 277, 10.1051/agro:19890307 · DOI
  5. Shukla H. S., 1987, Agric. Biol. Chem., 51, 1991, 10.1271/bbb1961.51.1991 · DOI
  6. Eleghede J. A., 1984, Carcinogenesis, 5, 661, 10.1093/carcin/5.5.661 · DOI
  7. Rhyu H. Y., 1979, J. Food Sci., 44, 758, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1979.tb08494.x · DOI
  8. 10.1093/jxb/33.4.810 · DOI
  9. Piccaglia R., 1991, J. Essent. Oil Res., 3, 147, 10.1080/10412905.1991.9700494 · DOI
  10. Deans S. G., 1987, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 5, 265, 10.1016/0168-1605(87)90111-5 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/ffj.2730050311 · DOI
  12. Araujo J. M.A., 1985, Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment., 5, 57
  13. Akgül A., 1988, Food Chem., 30, 319, 10.1016/0308-8146(88)90117-3 · DOI
  14. Deans S. G., 1988, J. Hort. Sci., 63, 503, 10.1080/14620316.1988.11515884 · DOI
  15. Von Seher A., 1976, Fette Seifen. Anstrichmittel, 78, 224, 10.1002/lipi.19760780602 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Marotti, M., Piccaglia, R., Giovanelli, E., Deans, S. G., & Eaglesham, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Scottish Agricultural College (GB)
Venue
Journal of Essential Oil Research
Published
1994-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
57-62
ISSN
  • 1041-2905 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-8152
OpenAlex
W1967610547
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Essential Oil Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant chemical constituents analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
Keywords
fennel, essential oil composition, cultivars, harvest time, (E)-anethole, limonene, fenchone, antibacterial activity, antifungal activity, Aeromonas hydrophila, Alcaligenes faecalis, Clostridium sporogenes, Aspergillus niger

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review