Cited by 16Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentManagement and Marketing EducationLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia: Portaging Leadership Lessons with a Critical Thinking Model

Niewoehner, Robert J., Steidle, Craig E.·2009·Engineering Management Journal

Abstract

:Business schools have long valued case studies as a tool for both broadening a student's perspective, and provoking them to deeper consideration of complex situations. The challenge with case studies is assuring the portability of the lessons; we don't expect students to see situations imitating those they've studied, hence the goal must instead be habits of mind and principles of action that the student can portage to the circumstances of their professional lives. This article evaluates the suitability of Richard Paul's Critical Thinking model as a template for evaluating engineering enterprise thinking habits and organizational behavior, using the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) report as a case study. With minor refinement, Paul's model provides a powerful vocabulary for complicated case study analysis; familiarity with the model provides participants with both a mechanism for analysis and a means for portaging lessons to other professional situations and organizations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10429247.2009.11431793

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bransford John D., 2000, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School
  2. Gehman H.W., 2003, Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Report Volume 1
  3. Moore David T., 2006, Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis
  4. Paul R.W., 2002, Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life
  5. Paul R.W., 2006, A Miniature Guide to Engineering Reasoning
  6. Tufte Edward R., 1997, Visual Explanations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Niewoehner, R. J., & Steidle, C. E.
Affiliations
United States Naval Academy (US)
Corresponding author
Niewoehner, Robert J.
Venue
Engineering Management Journal
Published
2009-03
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
9-18
ISSN
  • 1042-9247 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-0643
OpenAlex
W2033884985
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Engineering Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Management and Marketing Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Keywords
Space Shuttle Columbia accident, critical thinking model, Richard Paul, case study analysis, leadership, organizational behavior, habits of mind, organizational learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia: Portaging Leadership Lessons with a Critical Thinking Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10429247.2009.11431793
The paper
Niewoehner, R. J., & Steidle, C. E. (2009). The Loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia: Portaging Leadership Lessons with a Critical Thinking Model. Engineering Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2009.11431793