The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity growth
Abstract
We embed the innovation production function in a model that analyzes the impact of innovation output on manufacturing multi-factor productivity (MFP) growth. We combine a market share model with a gross output production function. This revenue approach enables a ‘demand-shift’ interpretation of the contribution of innovation to MFP growth. We apply different sets of instrumental variables and different estimation methods to estimate simultaneously the returns from innovation investment to innovation output, the contribution of innovation output to productivity growth and the feedback link running from a firm’s overall sales performance to its innovation endeavor. We draw our empirical results from the second Community Innovation Survey (CIS-2) for the Netherlands. The estimation results from our model show that the impact of innovation differs between measures of firm performance, and that, in our data, the revenue function approach yields more sensible results for the contribution of innovation to MFP growth than the value-added production function framework. Furthermore, the results show that the estimation of return on innovation investment benefits from the inclusion of more information on the technological environment of the firm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2233763 · Cited by 7,530
Cited by
On the relationship between innovation and performance: A sensitivity analysis
Lööf, H., & Heshmati, A. (2006) · Economics of Innovation and New Technology · doi:10.1080/10438590500512810 · Cited by 565
Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries
Crespi, G., & Zuniga, P. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010 · Cited by 554
The Importance of the Diverse Drivers and Types of Environmental Innovation for Firm Performance
Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2016) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1860 · Cited by 393
Chudnovsky, D., López, A., & Pupato, G. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.10.002 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Leeuwen, G., & Klomp, L.
- Venue
- Economics of Innovation and New Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 367-390
- ISSN
- 1043-8599 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-8364
- OpenAlex
- W2043255092
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10438590500512927
- The paper
- Van Leeuwen, G., & Klomp, L. (2006). On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500512927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.