Cited by 438Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentPlant and soil sciencesRural Development and Agriculture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agroecology as a Transdisciplinary, Participatory, and Action-Oriented Approach

Méndez, V. Ernesto, Bacon, Christopher M., Cohen, Roseann·2013·Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems

Abstract

This article traces multiple directions in the evolution of agroecology, from its early emphasis on ecological processes in agricultural systems, to its emergence as a multidimensional approach focusing on broader agro-food systems. This review is timely, as agroecology is being increasingly applied within a diversity of scientific-, policy-, and farmer-based initiatives. We contrast different agroecological perspectives or “agroecologies” and discuss the characteristics of an agroecology characterized by a transdisciplinary, participatory and action-oriented approach. Our final discussion describes the contents of the special issue, and states our goal for this compilation, which is to encourage future work that embraces an agroecological approach grounded in transdisciplinarity, participation, and transformative action.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10440046.2012.736926

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bacon C., 2005, CASFS Research Brief 6
  2. Blaikie P., 1987, Land degredation and society
  3. De Schutter O., 2011, Report presented at the 16th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council [A/HRC/16/49]. March 8
  4. De Schutter O., 2011, Solutions, 2, 33
  5. Freire P., 2000, Pedagogy of the oppressed
  6. Gliessman S. R., 1978, Seminarios regionales sobre agroecosistemas con enfasis en el estudio de tecnologia agricola tradicional
  7. Gliessman S. R., 1980, Biotica, 5, 93
  8. Guzmán-Casado G. I., 2007, Ecosistemas (Spain), 16, 24
  9. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, 2009, Agriculture at a crossroads [Global Report by the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD)]
  10. Iles A., Ecology and Society.
  11. Kremen C., Ecology and Society.
  12. Sevilla-Guzmán E, 2006, Agroecología (Spain), 1, 7
  13. Stringer E. T., 1999, Action research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–436 of 436

Metadata

Authors
Méndez, V. E., Bacon, C. M., & Cohen, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Santa Clara University (US)
  • Community Agroecology Network (US)
Corresponding author
Méndez, V. Ernesto
Venue
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2012-12-17
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
3-18
ISSN
  • 2168-3565 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-3573
OpenAlex
W1523011135
Cited by
438
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
FWCI
33.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
  • Social Sciences › Development › Rural Development and Agriculture
Keywords
agroecology, transdisciplinarity, participatory approach, action research, agri-food systems, transformative action, agroecology policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review