Cited by 175Knowledge Management and SharingTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourMedia and Digital Communication

The Influence of Cultural Differences on the Use of Social Network Services and the Formation of Social Capital

Ji, Yong Gu, Hwangbo, Hwan, Yi, Ji Soo, Rau, P. L. Patrick, Fang, Xiaowen, Ling, Chen·2010·International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

With the advent of Web 2.0, social network services (SNSs), such as Facebook and MySpace, have grown explosively and globally as one of core Web 2.0 applications. However, as revealed in other cultural comparison studies in the field of human–computer interaction, it is believed that cultural differences profoundly impact on how people use SNSs. Unfortunately, the differences in using SNSs have not been systematically investigated, so this study presents a web-based survey study among three nations: Republic of Korea, People's Republic of China, and the United States of America. It was assumed that SNS users form bridging and bonding social capital (borrowed from social capital theory) through the five functions of SNS that were categorized: Identity, Expert Search, Connection, Communication, and Contents Sharing. A correlation between social capital-related activities and usage patterns of SNS was expected. A total of 489 responded to the web-based survey through the three counties. Although the theory of cultural differences turned out to be insufficient to explain diverse usage patterns of SNSs, the results showed that Korean and Chinese users form bridging and bonding social capital mainly through Expert Search and Connection functions, but American users mainly use the Communication function to form bonding Social Capital. Various implications of these results for researchers and practitioners who work on and for SNSs are described as well.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2010.516727

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Koreans and Chinese used Expert Search and Connection for the formation and sustaining of both bonding and bridging social capital.

    “Koreans and Chinese used ‘Expert Search’ (i.e., searching for associated professionals online) and ‘Connection’ (i.e., maintaining offline relationships) for the formation and sustaining of both bonding and bridging social capital [52].”
  • Usage of different Facebook functions is associated with the creation and maintenance of either bridging or bonding social capital.

    “the usage of different Facebook functions was associated with the creation and maintenance of either bridging or bonding social capital.”
  • People in the US used the Communication function to bond with their peers.

    “People in the US used the ‘Communication’ function (i.e., conversation and opinion sharing) in order to bond with their peers.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 175

Authors
Ji, Y. G., Hwangbo, H., Yi, J. S., Rau, P. L. P., Fang, X., & Ling, C.
Affiliations
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • DePaul University (US)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Corresponding author
Ji, Yong Gu
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2010-11
Volume
26
Issue
11-12
Pages
1100-1121
ISSN
  • 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7590
OpenAlex
W2038212458
Cited by
175
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
30.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social networking sites, cultural differences, social capital, bridging social capital, bonding social capital, Web 2.0, expert search, online communication, cross-cultural comparison, Korea, China, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review