Cited by 77Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Throwing it all away: exploring affluent consumers' attitudes toward wasting edible food

Melbye, Elisabeth Lind, Onozaka, Yuko, Hansen, Håvard·2017·Journal of Food Products Marketing

Abstract

The skewed allocation of food across the world population is a major concern, as the result is that some of us live in abundant supply while others spend their life in constant scarcity. While researchers have studied a variety of issues related to the amounts of food being wasted, or the waste of edible food across consumers with different demographic characteristics, less is known about the drivers of attitudes toward food waste. Based on survey data from a sample of affluent Norwegian consumers, we test how subjective food knowledge, environmental concern, age, and income are related to consumer attitudes toward wasting edible food. We find that all variables except income drive consumer attitudes. Implications for theory and public policy are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10454446.2015.1048017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consumers who understand and concern about the severity of the FLW problem have lower FLW and the FLW reduction intention is also known to be larger.

    “In other words, consumers who understand and concern about the severity of the FLW problem have lower FLW and the FLW reduction intention is also known to be larger [98,99,100].”
  • The variability of food wasting habits across the sample suggests that there are varying levels of food skills in these households that may be associated with food waste generation.

    “The variability of food wasting habits across our sample also suggests that there are varying levels of food skills in these households that may be associated with food waste generation [e.g., meal planning, shopping, preparing and storing food: (14, 47–51)].”

    From Valuing the multiple impacts of household food waste (2019) · cites this paper as [51]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 77

Authors
Melbye, E. L., Onozaka, Y., & Hansen, H.
Affiliations
University of Stavanger (NO)
Corresponding author
Hansen, Håvard
Venue
Journal of Food Products Marketing
Published
2016-02-06
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
416-429
ISSN
  • 1045-4446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4102
OpenAlex
W2336232138
Cited by
77
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
FWCI
9.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Products Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
food waste, consumer attitudes, affluent consumers, environmental concern, age, income, food shortages, food waste policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review