Logistics of Behavior Screenings: How and Why Do We Conduct Behavior Screenings at Our School?
Abstract
In this article, the authors provide an overview of behavior screening tools available, including free and commercially available options. Next, the authors offer step-by-step procedures for (a) selecting, (b) scheduling, (c) preparing, (d) administering, and (e) scoring and interpreting behaviors screening tools. The authors conclude with recommendations and a brief summary.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SRSS has been found to be reliable and valid for students in kindergarten through sixth grade, with strong internal consistency and test-retest stability.
“The SRSS has been found to be reliable and valid for students in kindergarten through sixth grade (Oakes, Lane, Cox, & Messenger, 2014), with strong internal consistency (α > .85)and test-retest stability (r = .69-.79, p < .0001).”
From Evaluating the Zones of Regulation® intervention to improve the self-control of elementary students (2020) · cites this paper as Oakes, Lane, Cox, & Messenger, 2014
Cites
Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003) · Learning Disabilities Research & Practice · doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00072 · Cited by 868 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Academic screening in the response-to- intervention model allowed for a problem-solving approach to be used in which general education teachers and specialists collaborated to develop a plan for addressing individual student needs (D. Fuchs et al., 2003).”
MethodDevelopments in Curriculum-Based Measurement
Deno, S. L. (2003) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/00224669030370030801 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluating the Zones of Regulation® intervention to improve the self-control of elementary students
Ochocki, S., Frey, A. J., Patterson, D. A., Herron, F., Beck, N., & Dupper, D. R. (2020) · International Journal of School Social Work · doi:10.4148/2161-4148.1046 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Oakes, W. P., Lane, K. L., Cox, M. L., & Messenger, M.
- Venue
- Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-05-12
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-170
- ISSN
- 1045-988X
- 1940-4387
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
