The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review
Open accessAbstract
This review provides a new integration of recent research that has formed the basis of a social identity explanation of supportive collective behaviour among survivors in emergencies and disasters. I describe a model in which a sense of common fate is the source of an emergent shared social identity among survivors, which in turn provides the motivation to give social support to others affected. In addition, by drawing on the concept of relational transformation in psychological crowds, I show how an emergent shared social identity can engender a range of further behavioural and cognitive consequences that contribute to collective self-organisation in emergencies, including expected support, coordination of behaviour, and collective efficacy. It will be argued that the model can been applied to explaining how potentially dangerous crowd events avoid disaster: shared social identity operates as the basis of spontaneous self-organisation in these cases, as in many emergencies and disasters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cooperation and orderly, norm-governed behaviour are common across a range of emergencies and disasters.
“cooperation and orderly, norm-governed behaviour are common across a range of emergencies and disasters”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 159 · Cited by 346
- Authors
- Drury, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Drury, John
- ORCID
- Drury, John
- Venue
- European Review of Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-81
- ISSN
- 1046-3283 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-277X
- OpenAlex
- W2793535696
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 159
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 65.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- European Review of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust (F/00 230/AO)
- Centro de Medición Mide UC, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and the Interdisciplinary Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies Funding Agency (CONICYT/FONDAP/15130009)
- Economic and Social Research Council (RES-000-23-0446 and ES/N01068X/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
- Keywords
- social identity, disasters, collective behavior, common fate, social support, relational transformation, collective efficacy, crowd safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review