Influence of the Sources of Science Teaching Self-Efficacy in Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Identity Development
Abstract
The purpose of this mixed-methods research was to investigate changes in preservice elementary teachers’ science teacher identities and self-efficacy beliefs as they participate in a field-based science methods course. A total of 121 preservice teachers participated, four of which were purposefully selected who held varied initial levels of science content preparedness and confidence to teach. Data sources included pre- and post-course administrations of the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument-B, an open-ended questionnaire, two semi-structured interviews with selected participants, written teaching reflections, classroom observations, and artifacts. Data analyses included a pre-post repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) design, and the case study approach. The themes generated by using open and axial coding belonged to Bandura’s sources of self-efficacy and Gee’s identity framework. Results indicated statistically significant gains in participants’ science self-efficacy beliefs. Qualitative analysis revealed that the nature of prior science experiences shaped participants’ self-efficacy and identity uniquely. Findings are summarized under four major themes suggesting ways in which Bandura’s sources of self-efficacy played role in shaping preservice teachers’ identity. Emerging from this study was the close connection between the two constructs- self-efficacy and science teacher identity. The study includes implications for preservice teacher education progra…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gee's (2000) delineation of four ways to view identity across contexts of the individual, institutions, discourse and affinity groups is incorporated into research frameworks.
“Gee's (2000) delineation of four ways to view identity across contexts of the individual, institutions, discourse and affinity groups is also incorporated into research frameworks (Menon, 2020;Seban,”
From Understanding teacher identity in teachers' professional lives: A systematic review of the literature (2023) · cites this paper as Menon, 2020
Cites
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20237 · Cited by 2,433 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rushton, E. A. C., Rawlings Smith, E., Steadman, S., & Towers, E. (2023) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.3417 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
- Authors
- Menon, D.
- Affiliations
- Towson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Menon, Deepika
- ORCID
- Menon, Deepika
- Venue
- Journal of Science Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-28
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 460-481
- ISSN
- 1046-560X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1847
- OpenAlex
- W3003941038
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Science Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- science teaching self-efficacy, science teacher identity, pre-service primary teachers, sources of self-efficacy, self-efficacy theory, teacher identity formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review