The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Asbestos Exposures During Routine Floor Tile Maintenance. Part 2: Ultra High Speed Burnishing and Wet-Stripping
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate airborne asbestos concentrations during ultra high speed (UHS) burnishing and wet-stripping of asbestos-containing resilient floor tile under two levels of floor care condition (poor and good). Airborne asbestos concentrations were measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) before and during each floor care maintenance procedure in the breathing zone of the custodial personnel. Airborne total fiber concentrations were also measured by phase contrast microscopy (PCM) for comparison with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 0.1 f/cm3, 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA). This study shows that UHS burnishing and wet-stripping of asbestos-containing resilient floor tile can result in elevated levels of airborne asbestos. UHS burnishing and wet-stripping produced similar increases in airborne asbestos concentrations when compared with baseline measurements. Approximately 99.5 percent of the asbestos structures were ≤5 μm in length and were primarily fibers (92%) and, to a lesser extent, bundles, clusters, and matrices. None of the 8-hour TWA concentrations measured during wet-stripping exceeded the OSHA PEL; however, the PEL was exceeded by all of the 8-hour TWA concentrations measured during UHS burnishing. The elevated levels of total fibers were due to a nonasbestos-containing powder generated during the burnishing of the floor tile. TEM analyses showed that the PCM analyses did…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The sector of activity corresponding to the removal of floor tiles stands a priori by the very low level or absence of LAF [10,13,14].”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“In these studies the non-regulated fibers, SAF, and LAF with a diameter < 0.2 μm, represented between 50 and 100% of the total fibers, with the majority of samples between 80 and 100% respectively.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Analysis of asbestos size categories according to sectors of activity and the concentration levels found in the literature [10-18] highlight a number of sectors with higher prevalence of SAF, including in particular asbestos cement production, friction materials production, brake systems repair and mining.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 1991, Asbestos in Public and Commercial Buildings: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Current Knowledge
- 1990, Fed. Reg., 55, 5145
- Edwards A., 1994, Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 9, 132, 10.1080/1047322X.1994.10388284 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Evaluation of Asbestos Fiber Release During Maintenance of Asbestos-Containing Floor Tile
- Kominsky J. R., 1998, Part 1: Spray-Buffing and Wet-Stripping. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 13, 101, 10.1080/1047322X.1998.10389133 · DOI · Paper page
- Kominsky J. R., 1995, Airborne Asbestos Concentrations During Buffing, Burnishing, and Stripping of Resilient Floor Tile
- 1982, Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos Bulk Samples
- Chatfield E. J., 1988, SOP: Analysis of Resilient Floor Tile
- Kominsky J. R., 1997, Evaluation of the Implementation of Operations and Maintenance Programs in New Jersey Schools
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Measurements of airborne asbestos fibres during refurbishing
Ervik, T. K., Hammer, S. E., Skaugset, N. P., & Graff, P. (2023) · Annals of Work Exposures and Health · doi:10.1093/annweh/wxad041 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kominsky, J. R., Freyberg, R. W., Clark, P. J., Hollett, B. A., Edwards, A., Wilmoth, R. C., Boiano, J. M., & Brackett, K. A.
- Venue
- Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-112
- ISSN
- 1047-322X
- 1521-0898
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
