The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synthesis of Environmental Evidence: Nitrogen Dioxide Epidemiology Studies
Open accessAbstract
The use of meta-analysis is becoming more common in the medical literature, but it is not common in the environmental literature. Although meta-analysis cannot combine a group of poorly executed, conflicting studies to get an unequivocal answer, there are certain situations where it can be helpful. The inability of studies to produce similar results may be a function of the power of the studies rather than a reflection of their quality. The literature on the effects of nitrogen dioxide on the odds of respiratory illness in children is such an example. Three quantitative methods for the synthesis of this evidence are presented. Although the methods produce slightly different results, the conclusion from all three methods is that the increase in the odds of respiratory illness in children exposed to a long-term increase of 30 micrograms/m3 (comparable to the increase resulting from exposure to a gas stove) is about 20 percent. This estimated increase is not sensitive to the method of analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evaluation of networks of randomized trials
Salanti, G., Higgins, J. P., Ades, A., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2008) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280207080643 · Cited by 1,078
Respiratory risks from household air pollution in low and middle income countries
Gordon, S. B., Bruce, N. G., Grigg, J., Hibberd, P. L., Kurmi, O. P., Lam, K.-B. H., Mortimer, K., Asante, K. P., Balakrishnan, K., Balmes, J., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70168-7 · Cited by 953
Wieslander, G., Norbäck, D., Björnsson, E., Janson, C., & Boman, G. (1996) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s004200050125 · Cited by 334
A Method to Estimate the Chronic Health Impact of Air Pollutants in U.S. Residences
Logue, J. M., Price, P. N., Sherman, M. H., & Singer, B. C. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104035 · Cited by 251
Synthesis of observational studies should consider credibility ceilings
Salanti, G., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.014 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Hasselblad, V., Eddy, D. M., & Kotchmar, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 662-671
- ISSN
- 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058531919
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthesis of Environmental Evidence: Nitrogen Dioxide Epidemiology Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10473289.1992.10467018
- The paper
- Hasselblad, V., Eddy, D. M., & Kotchmar, D. J. (1992). Synthesis of Environmental Evidence: Nitrogen Dioxide Epidemiology Studies. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10467018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.