Cited by 10Air Quality and Health ImpactsEnvironmental and Air Quality ManagementAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting

Evaluation of Human Exposure to Ambient PM10 in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City Using a GIS-Based Methodology

Open access
Cicero-Fernandez, Pablo, Torres, Victor, Rosales, Alberto, Cesar, Herman, Dorland, Kees, Muñoz, Roberto, Uribe, Ricardo, Martinez, Ana Patricia·2001·Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association

Abstract

The main goal of this study was to evaluate the magnitude of outdoor exposure to fine particulate matter (PM10) potentially experienced by the population of metropolitan Mexico City. With the use of a geographic information system (GIS), spatially resolved PM10 distributions were generated and linked to the local population. The PM10 concentration exceeded the 24-hr air quality standard of 150 microg/m3 on 16% of the days, and the annual air quality standard of 50 microg/m3 was exceeded by almost twice its value in some places. The basic methodology described in this paper integrates spatial demographic and air quality databases, allowing the evaluation of various air pollution reduction scenarios. Achieving the annual air quality standard would represent a reduction in the annual arithmetic average concentration of 14 microg/m3 for the typical inhabitant. Human exposure to particulate matter (PM) has been associated with mortality and morbidity in Mexico City; reducing the concentration levels of this pollutant would represent a reduction in mortality and morbidity and the associated cost of such impacts. This methodology is critical to assessing the potential benefits of the current initiative to improve air quality implemented by the Environmental Metropolitan Commission of Mexico City.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10473289.2001.10464385

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disease prevention is the most effective form of healthcare because it protects people from illness, saves money, minimizes suffering, and improves quality of life.

    “Disease prevention is the most effective form of healthcare because it protects people from illness, and as a result, saves money, minimizes suffering and improves the quality of life of the American public ( 1-9 ).”

    From Community-based participatory research as a tool to advance environmental health sciences (2002) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Abstract and Conclusions say that reducing particulate pollution in Mexico City could reduce illness, mortality, and associated costs. They do not establish that disease prevention is the most effective form of healthcare, or address suffering, quality of life, or the American public. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Mage, D.; Ozolins, G.; Peterson, P.; Webster, A.; Orthofer, R.; Vandeweerd, V.; Gwynne, M. Urban Air Pollution in Megacities of the World; Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30 (5), 681-686.
  2. Lacasana-Navarro, M.; Aguilar-Garduno, C.; Romieu, I. Evolution of Air Pollution and Impact of Control Programs in Three Megacities of Latin America; Salud Publica de Mexico 1999, 41 (3), 203-215.
  3. Edgerton, S.A.; Bian, X.; Doran, J.C.; Fast, J.D.; Hubbe, J.M.; Malone, E.L.; Shaw, W.J.; Whiteman, C.D.; Zhong, S.; Arriaga, J.L.; Ortiz, E.; Ruiz, M.; Sosa, G.; Vega, E.; Limon, T.; Guzman, F.; Archuleta, J.; Bossert, J.E.; Elliot, S.M.; Lee, J.T.; McNair, L.A.; Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Coulter, R.L.; Doskey, P.V.; Gaffney, J.S.; Marley, N.A.; Neff, W.; Petty, R. Particu- late Air Pollution in Mexico City: A Collaborative Research Project; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49 (10), 1221-1229.
  4. Aldape, F.; Flores, J.; Diaz, R.V. Seasonal Study of the Composition of Atmospheric Aerosols in Mexico City; Int. J. PIXE 1991, 1, 355-371.
  5. Miranda, J.; Andrade, E.; Lopez-Suarez, A.; Ledesma, R.; Cahill, T.A.; Wakabayashi, P.H. A Receptor Model for Atmospheric Aereosols from a Southwestern Site in Mexico City; Atmos. Environ. 1996, 30 (20), 3471-3479.
  6. Vega, E.; Garcia, I.; Apam, D.; Ruiz, M.E.; Barbiaux, M. Application of a Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model to Respirable Particulate Matter in Mexico City; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47 (4), 524-529.
  7. Catillejos, M.; Gold, D.R.; Dockery, D.; Tosteson, R.; Baum, T.; Speizer, F.E. Effects of Ambient Ozone on Respiratory Function and Symp- toms in Mexico City Schoolchildren; Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1992, 145, 276-282.
  8. Gold, D.R.; Damokosh, A.I.; Pope, C.A.; Dockery, D.W.; McDonnell, W.F.; Serrano, P.; Retama, A.; Castillejos, M. Particulate and Ozone Pollutant Effects on the Respiratory Function of Children in South- west Mexico City; Epidemiology 1999, 10 (8), 8-16.
  9. Romieu, I.; Meneses, F.; Sierra-Monge, J.J.; Huerta, J.; Ruiz-Velazco, S.; White, M.C.; Etzel, R.; Hernandez-Avila, M. Effects of Urban Air Pollutants on Emergency Visits for Childhood Asthma in Mexico City; J. Epidemiol. 1995, 141, 546-53.
  10. Romieu, I.; Meneses, F.; Ruiz-Velazco, S.; Sierra-Monge, J.J.; Huerta, J.; White, M.C.; Etzel, R. Effects of Air Pollution on the Respiratory Health of Asthmatic Children Living in Mexico City; Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 1996, 154, 300-307.
  11. Loomis, D.P.; Borja-Aburto, V.H.; Bangdiwala, S.I.; Shy, C.M. Ozone Ex- posure and Daily Mortality in Mexico City: A Time-Series Analysis; Research Report Number 75; Health Effects Institute: Cambridge, MA, 1996.
  12. Borja-Aburto, V.H.; Loomis, D.P.; Bangdiwala, S.I.; Shy, C.M.; Rascon- Pacheco, R.A. Ozone, Suspended Particulates, and Daily Mortality in Mexico City; Am. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 145 (3), 258-268.
  13. Borja-Aburto, V.H.; Castillejos, M.; Gold, D.R.; Bierzwinski, S.; Loomis, D. Mortality and Ambient Fine Particles in Southwest Mexico City, 1993-1995; Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 106 (12), 849-855.
  14. Loomis, D.; Castillejos, M.; Gold, D.R.; McDonnell, W.; Borja-Aburto, V.H. Air Pollution and Infant Mortality in Mexico City; Epidemiology 1999, 10 (2), 118-123.
  15. Ott, W.R.; Mage, D.T.; Thomas, J. Comparison of Microenvironmen- tal CO Concentrations in Two Cities for Human Exposure Modeling; J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1992, 2 (2), 249-267.
  16. Georgopoulos, P.G.; Purushothaman, V.; Chiou, R. Comparative Evalu- ation Methods for Estimating Potential Human Exposure to Ozone: Photochemical Modeling and Ambient Monitoring; J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1997, 7 (2), 191-215.
  17. Law, P.L.; Lioy, P.J.; Zelenka, M.P.; Huber, A.H.; McCurdy, T.R. Evalu- ation of a Probabilistic Exposure Model Applied to Carbon Monox- ide (pNEM/CO) Using Denver Personal Exposure Monitoring Data; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1997, 47, 491-500.
  18. Duan, N.; Mage, D.T. Combination of Direct and Indirect Approaches for Exposure Assessment; J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1997, 7 (4), 439-470.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cicero-Fernandez, P., Torres, V., Rosales, A., Cesar, H., Dorland, K., Muñoz, R., Uribe, R., & Martinez, A. P.
Affiliations
  • a Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health , University of California , Los Angeles , USA
  • b National Center of Environmental Health , Metepec , Mexico , USA
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (MX)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas (US)
Venue
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Published
2001-11
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
1586-1593
ISSN
  • 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-2247
  • 2162-2906
OpenAlex
W2164713029
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • World Bank Group
  • California Air Resources Board
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental and Air Quality Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Keywords
PM10, PM2.5, human exposure, ambient air pollution, Mexico City, air quality standards, spatial distribution of pollution, population exposure assessment, air pollution health effects, air quality improvement
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Health, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Mexico, Models, Theoretical, Morbidity, Mortality, Particle Size, Public Health, Public Policy, Urban Population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review