The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing Spatial Variability of Ambient Nitrogen Dioxide in Montréal, Canada, with a Land-Use Regression Model
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this study was to derive a land-use regression model to estimate on a geographical basis ambient concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. These estimates of concentrations of NO2 will be subsequently used to assess exposure in epidemiologic studies on the health effects of traffic-related air pollution. In May 2003, NO2 was measured for 14 consecutive days at 67 sites across the city using Ogawa passive diffusion samplers. Concentrations ranged from 4.9 to 21.2 ppb (median 11.8 ppb). Linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between logarithmic concentrations of NO2 and land-use variables derived using the ESRI Arc 8 geographic information system. In univariate analyses, NO2 was negatively associated with the area of open space and positively associated with traffic count on nearest highway, the length of highways within any radius from 100 to 750 m, the length of major roads within 750 m, and population density within 2000 m. Industrial land-use and the length of minor roads showed-no association with NO2. In multiple regression analyses, distance from the nearest highway, traffic count on the nearest highway, length of highways and major roads within 100 m, and population density showed significant associations with NO2; the best-fitting regression model had a R2 of 0.54. These analyses confirm the value of land-use regression modeling to assign exposures in large-scale epidemiologic studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Near-Roadway Air Quality: Synthesizing the Findings from Real-World Data
Karner, A. A., Eisinger, D. S., & Niemeier, D. A. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es100008x · Cited by 767
Effect of exposure to traffic on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age: a cohort study
Gauderman, W. J., Vora, H., McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Gilliland, F., Thomas, D., Lurmann, F., Avol, E., Kunzli, N., Jerrett, M., et al. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60037-3 · Cited by 758
Self-citationAtopic diseases, allergic sensitization, and exposure to traffic-related air pollution in children.
Morgenstern, V., Zutavern, A., Cyrys, J., Brockow, I., Koletzko, S., Krämer, U., Behrendt, H., Herbarth, O., von Berg, A., Bauer, C. P., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200701-036oc · Cited by 567
Henderson, S. B., Beckerman, B., Jerrett, M., & Brauer, M. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0606780 · Cited by 503
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilbert, N. L., Goldberg, M. S., Beckerman, B., Brook, J. R., & Jerrett, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1059-1063
- ISSN
- 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-2247
- 2162-2906
- OpenAlex
- W2327514691
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing Spatial Variability of Ambient Nitrogen Dioxide in Montréal, Canada, with a Land-Use Regression Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10473289.2005.10464708
- The paper
- Gilbert, N. L., Goldberg, M. S., Beckerman, B., Brook, J. R., & Jerrett, M. (2005). Assessing Spatial Variability of Ambient Nitrogen Dioxide in Montréal, Canada, with a Land-Use Regression Model. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2005.10464708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.