The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Receptor Modeling of Ambient Particulate Matter Data Using Positive Matrix Factorization: Review of Existing Methods
Open accessAbstract
Methods for apportioning sources of ambient particulate matter (PM) using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) algorithm are reviewed. Numerous procedural decisions must be made and algorithmic parameters selected when analyzing PM data with PMF. However, few publications document enough of these details for readers to evaluate, reproduce, or compare results between different studies. For example, few studies document why some species were used and others not used in the modeling, how the number of factors was selected, or how much uncertainty exists in the solutions. More thorough documentation will aid the development of standard protocols for analyzing PM data with PMF and will reveal more clearly where research is needed to help future analysts select from the various possible procedures and parameters available in PMF. For example, research likely is needed to determine optimal approaches for handling data below detection limits, ways to apportion PM mass among sources identified by PMF, and ways to estimate uncertainties in the solution. The review closes with recommendations for documenting the methodological details of future PMF analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Almeida, S. M., Manousakas, M., Diapouli, E., Kertesz, Z., Samek, L., Hristova, E., Šega, K., Alvarez, R. P., Belis, C. A., & Eleftheriadis, K. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115199 · Cited by 137
Seasonal changes, identification and source apportionment of PAH in PM 1.0
Agudelo-Castañeda, D. M., & Teixeira, E. C. (2014) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.030 · Cited by 124
Liu, Q., Liu, Y., Yin, J., Zhang, M., & Zhang, T. (2014) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.03.057 · Cited by 102
Chemical source profiles of urban fugitive dust PM2.5 samples from 21 cities across China
Sun, J., Shen, Z., Zhang, L., Lei, Y., Gong, X., Zhang, Q., Zhang, T., Xu, H., Cui, S., Wang, Q., et al. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.374 · Cited by 97
Masiol, M., Squizzato, S., Formenton, G., Khan, M. B., Hopke, P. K., Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., Tositti, L., Benetello, F., Visin, F., et al. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135287 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Reff, A., Eberly, S. I., & Bhave, P. V.
- Venue
- Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 146-154
- ISSN
- 1047-3289 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-2247
- 2162-2906
- OpenAlex
- W2170013960
- Cited by
- 725
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Receptor Modeling of Ambient Particulate Matter Data Using Positive Matrix Factorization: Review of Existing Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10473289.2007.10465319
- The paper
- Reff, A., Eberly, S. I., & Bhave, P. V. (2007). Receptor Modeling of Ambient Particulate Matter Data Using Positive Matrix Factorization: Review of Existing Methods. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2007.10465319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.