CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation Pedagogy and PracticesTeacher Education and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What should teacher education be about? Initial comparisons from Scotland and Alberta

Adams, Paul, Burns, Amy·2023·Teaching Education
DOI 10.1080/10476210.2023.2166918
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article empirically examines the ways in which Initial Teacher Education in Scotland and Alberta, Canada, seeks to ‘get students in’, ‘get them out and into the workforce’, ‘get on with teaching future teachers’ and how it should ‘get on with students’. Using Adams’ (2016) policy heuristic, which posits that policy can be discerned in three realms: frame; explanation; and formation, this paper considers the middle realm: that of policy explanation. Here, attempts to position policy through public pronouncement, policy directive, mandate and/or missive are examined in the context of ITE in Scotland and Alberta. By analysing policy explanations, the paper marks out how both jurisdictions should begin to attempt to craft ITE located in career-long, professional learning and development that understands and acknowledges tensions between ITE and later teacher-education phases. Finally, the paper makes a tentative proposal as to what such ITE might hope to achieve and how it might contribute to a well-developed workforce, so that both locations and other jurisdictions might orient initial teacher development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10476210.2023.2166918

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1080/02607476.2021.190941 · DOI
  2. General Teaching Council Scotland (GTCS). (2012b). The student teacher code. Retrieved from www.gtcs.org.uk
  3. General Teaching Council Scotland (GTCS). (2017). The general teaching council for Scotland fitness to teach and appeals rules 2012. GTCS.
  4. General Teaching Council Scotland (GTCS). (2019). Memorandum on entry requirements to programmes of initial teacher education in Scotland. GTCS.
  5. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Adams, P., & Burns, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Adams, Paul
ORCID
Venue
Teaching Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2023-01-20
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
403-419
ISSN
  • 1047-6210 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1286
DOI
10.1080/10476210.2023.2166918
OpenAlex
W4317569411
Cited by
2
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Teaching Education (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Government of Alberta
  • Ministry of Advanced Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
Keywords
initial teacher education, teacher education policy, policy explanation, Scotland, Alberta, teacher workforce development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review