Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: the impact of students’ perceptions of collaboration on their knowledge understanding and behavioral patterns
Abstract
Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping (CSCCM) integrates technology and concept mapping to support students’ knowledge understanding, and much research on the behavioral patterns involved in CSCCM activities has been conducted. However, there is limited understanding of the differences in knowledge understanding and behavioral patterns between students with different levels of collaboration perception. This study examined the impact of students’ perceptions of collaboration on their knowledge understanding and behavioral patterns in the CSCCM activity. A total of 36 individuals from the same university participated in this study. The findings suggested that compared with students with a low level of collaborative perception, students with a high level of collaborative perception could obtain better conceptual knowledge understanding. However, there was no significant difference in factual knowledge understanding between students with different levels of collaboration perception. For behavioral patterns, students with a high level of collaboration perception demonstrated more diverse behavioral transition sequences, students with a middle level of collaboration perception demonstrated more repetitive behavioral sequences, and students with a low level of collaboration perception demonstrated less behavioral transition sequences. The findings of this research can provide a reference for teachers to design CSCCM activities in the classroom.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior work by Liu et al. (2021) and Yan (2023) shows that AI-assisted language learning tools advance EFL learners' writing abilities.
“These quantitative findings resonate with the observations made by Liu et al. (2021) and Yan (2023), who underscored the profound contributions of AI-assisted language learning tools in advancing EFL learners’ writing abilities.”
From Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students (2023) · cites this paper as Liu et al. (2021)
Cites
Using Concept Maps to Facilitate Collaborative Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning
Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.748664 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Teachers' Perceptions of Technology Integration in Teaching-Learning Practices: A Systematic Review
Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
“Recognizing the importance of students’ active involvement in the learning activities, Liu S. et al. (2021) also suggested teachers design collaborative activities via the computer-supported collaborative concept mapping (CSCCM) technique to develop a collaborative classroom environment, which also…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA closer look at ChatGPT's role in concept map generation for education
Schicchi, D., Limongelli, C., Monteleone, V., & Taibi, D. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2025.2497110 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, S., Kang, L., Liu, Z., Fang, J., Yang, Z., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Hu, M.
- Affiliations
- Central China Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Kang, Lingyun
- Venue
- Interactive Learning Environments
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-05-19
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3340-3359
- ISSN
- 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5191
- OpenAlex
- W3163136630
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61977030, 62077017, 61937001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- concept mapping, knowledge understanding, conceptual knowledge, factual knowledge, behavioral patterns, cooperative learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review