Cited by 42Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Technology and AssessmentOnline and Blended Learning

Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: the impact of students’ perceptions of collaboration on their knowledge understanding and behavioral patterns

Liu, Sannyuya, Kang, Lingyun, Liu, Zhi, Fang, Jing, Yang, Zongkai, Sun, Jianwen, Wang, Meiyi, Hu, Mengwei·2023·Interactive Learning Environments

Abstract

Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping (CSCCM) integrates technology and concept mapping to support students’ knowledge understanding, and much research on the behavioral patterns involved in CSCCM activities has been conducted. However, there is limited understanding of the differences in knowledge understanding and behavioral patterns between students with different levels of collaboration perception. This study examined the impact of students’ perceptions of collaboration on their knowledge understanding and behavioral patterns in the CSCCM activity. A total of 36 individuals from the same university participated in this study. The findings suggested that compared with students with a low level of collaborative perception, students with a high level of collaborative perception could obtain better conceptual knowledge understanding. However, there was no significant difference in factual knowledge understanding between students with different levels of collaboration perception. For behavioral patterns, students with a high level of collaboration perception demonstrated more diverse behavioral transition sequences, students with a middle level of collaboration perception demonstrated more repetitive behavioral sequences, and students with a low level of collaboration perception demonstrated less behavioral transition sequences. The findings of this research can provide a reference for teachers to design CSCCM activities in the classroom.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2021.1927115

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, S., Kang, L., Liu, Z., Fang, J., Yang, Z., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Hu, M.
Affiliations
Central China Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Kang, Lingyun
Venue
Interactive Learning Environments
Published
2021-05-19
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
3340-3359
ISSN
  • 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5191
OpenAlex
W3163136630
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61977030, 62077017, 61937001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
concept mapping, knowledge understanding, conceptual knowledge, factual knowledge, behavioral patterns, cooperative learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review