Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancing the prediction of student performance based on the machine learning XGBoost algorithm

Asselman, Amal, Khaldi, Mohamed, Aammou, Souhaib·2023·Interactive Learning Environments

Abstract

Performance Factors Analysis (PFA) is considered one of the most important Knowledge Tracing (KT) approaches used for constructing adaptive educational hypermedia systems. It has shown a high prediction accuracy against many other KT approaches. While, the desire to estimate more accurately the student level leads researchers to enhance PFA by inventing several advanced extensions. However, most of the proposed extensions have exclusively been improved in a pedagogical sense, as the improvements have mostly been limited to the analysis of students’ behaviour during their learning process. In contrast, Machine Learning provides many powerful methods that could be efficient to enhance, in the technical sense, the prediction of student performance. Our goal is to focus on the exploitation of Ensemble Learning methods as an extremely effective Machine Learning paradigm used to create many advanced solutions in several fields. In this sense, we propose a new PFA approach based on different models (Random Forest, AdaBoost, and XGBoost) in order to increase the predictive accuracy of student performance. Our models have been evaluated on three different datasets. The experimental results show that the scalable XGBoost has outperformed the other evaluated models and substantially improved the performance prediction compared to the original PFA algorithm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2021.1928235

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Gong Y., 2011, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21, 27
  2. González-Brenes J., 2014, The 7th International Conference on Educational Data mining, 84
  3. Koch N. P., 2001, Software Engineering for adaptive hypermedia systems-reference model
  4. Pelánek R., 2015, International Educational Data Mining Society
  5. 10.1145/3231644.3231675 · doi:10.1145/3231644.3231675
  6. Piech C., 2015, Advances in neural information processing systems, 505
  7. Rihák J., 2015, International Educational Data Mining Society
  8. Xiong X., 2016, International Educational Data Mining Society

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Asselman, A., Khaldi, M., & Aammou, S.
Venue
Interactive Learning Environments
Published
2021-05-19
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
3360-3379
ISSN
  • 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5191
OpenAlex
W3161224560
Cited by
490
References
37
FWCI
46.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing the prediction of student performance based on the machine learning XGBoost algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10494820.2021.1928235
The paper
Asselman, A., Khaldi, M., & Aammou, S. (2023). Enhancing the prediction of student performance based on the machine learning XGBoost algorithm. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1928235

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.