Cited by 35Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsScience Education and PedagogyIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

A concept mapping-based self-regulated learning approach to promoting students’ learning achievement and self-regulation in STEM activities

Fang, Jian-Wen, He, Li-Yuan, Hwang, Gwo-Jen, Zhu, Xiu-Wei, Bian, Chu-Nu, Fu, Qing-Ke·2023·Interactive Learning Environments

Abstract

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education is attracting increasing attention, but how to improve students’ STEM learning achievement is still a big challenge. In the process of learning, students actively set learning goals, organize learning content, set learning standards, and independently adapt learning strategies and monitoring measures in order to achieve their own learning goals and to help them learn STEM knowledge and skills. Concept mapping is considered to be an effective visualized knowledge organizing tool that helps students to manage and organize their knowledge systematically and visually. This study proposes a concept mapping-based self-regulated learning approach. A quasi-experiment was conducted using a concept mapping-based self-regulated learning system in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the approach. The experimental results show that the proposed approach significantly improved students’ STEM skills, but not their STEM knowledge compared to the conventional self-regulated learning approach. The proposed learning approach helped to improve students’ self-regulation compared to the conventional self-regulation learning approach. In short, the concept mapping-based self-regulation learning approach enhances students’ self-efficacy and self-regulation, which in turn helps students to learn STEM skills effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10494820.2022.2061013

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The choice of concept map construction mode and whether construction is student- or teacher-led are still hot topics that urgently need deeper exploration.

    “The choice of concept map construction mode, that is, whether students should construct concept maps individually or collaboratively (Aşıksoy, 2019; Fang, 2023), and whether the construction process is student- or teacher-led (Huang et al., 2022; Hwang et al., 2023), are still hot topics in the current research and urgently need to be explored and answered in greater depth.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, J.-W., He, L.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., Zhu, X.-W., Bian, C.-N., & Fu, Q.-K.
Affiliations
  • Wenzhou University (CN)
  • College of Education, Wenzhou University, Chashan University Town, Wenzhou City, People’s Republic of China
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Huzhou Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Xiu-Wei
Venue
Interactive Learning Environments
Published
2022-04-13
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
7159-7181
ISSN
  • 1049-4820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5191
OpenAlex
W4223635422
Cited by
35
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
10.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interactive Learning Environments (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Education of Zhejiang Province
  • The National Educational Science Plan (BCA190089)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
concept mapping, student self-regulation, STEM education, academic performance, self-regulation, self-efficacy, knowledge organization, learning strategies, STEM skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review