Evaluation Studies of Flower Extract of Butea monosperma as Herbal Indicator
Abstract
The stability study of flower extract of Butea monosperma (FEBM) was evaluated by studying the effect of different pH (1 to 14) on the color of FEBM as well as comparing the absorbance pattern. The FEBM was also evaluated for its indicator property using titrimetric analyses involving various acid-base titrations. The results showed good stability of FEBM at acidic and neutral pH but not in alkaline pH. The titrimetric analysis with FEBM showed sharp and intense color change at the end point which may be due to the presence of flavonoids, and it can be used as an alternative to routine synthetic indicators.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- More, B. H., Sakharwade, S. N., & Sakarkar, D. M.
- Corresponding author
- More, Babita H.
- Venue
- Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-04-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-190
- ISSN
- 1049-6475 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-3580
- OpenAlex
- W2313529429
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Herbs Spices & Medicinal Plants (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Biological Stains and Phytochemicals
- Keywords
- Butea monosperma, flower extract, pH stability, color change, acid-base titration, flavonoids, natural indicators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
