The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Heroic Savior, the Jungle Guide and the Beacon Amidst a Fog of Uncertainty: Agency of Fathers in Prolonged Postdivorce Conflicts and Their Positioning of Children
Open accessAbstract
This qualitative study aims to explore how fathers in prolonged post-divorce conflict construct their parenting agency and position their child in relation to their view of conflict-related threats. Eight divorced fathers were interviewed, with experience of, on average, seven years of high conflict after separation. A reflective thematic design supplemented with positioning theory was used to analyze the fathers’ responses. Drawing on positioning theory, the fathers’ agency emerged in the analyses from three dominant storylines or world manifestations of post-divorce dangers. Fathers either acted as (1) heroic saviors in a polluted realm storyline where they positioned their children as victims that need to be saved from the dangers of impurity, (2) jungle guides in the wild nature storyline where they positioned their children as trainees of survival skills to deal with intrusive events and ever present post-divorce dangers, or (3) beacons in a foggy moor storyline where they re-positioned their own behavior to follow a self-clarifying routine so that their children would experience life in a less ambivalent, foggy and insecure manner. We argue that researchers and therapists would benefit from knowledge that captures the moral underpinnings of fathers’ agency.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Positional reflexivity is an important principle in systemic practice in general.
“Furthermore, positional reflexivity is also referred to as an important principle in systemic practice in general (Lini & Bertrando, 2022;Stokkebekk et al., 2022).”
From Researching what we practice—The paradigm of systemic family research: Part 2 (2023) · cites this paper as Stokkebekk et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 · Cited by 9,184
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- 10.1080/10502556.2018.1458205 · DOI
- 10.1080/01926187.2010.530194 · DOI
- 10.1080/13229400.2016.1195277 · DOI
- Benson C, 2003, The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts
- 10.1080/15379418.2017.1365320 · DOI
- 10.1080/13229400.2020.1869578 · DOI
- 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10826-019-01380-1 · DOI
- 10.1080/09649069.2021.1953857 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10567-022-00379-3 · DOI
- 10.1080/0142569900110306 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/anzf.1344 · DOI
- Emery R. E, 2011, Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation
- 10.1332/204674317X14920695828859 · DOI
- Goffman E, 1971, The presentation of self in everyday life
- 10.1515/9781400851898 · DOI
- 10.1177/0959354308101417 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10680-020-09563-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.07.001 · DOI
- 10.18261/issn.0807-7487-2020-04-02 · DOI
- Johnston J. R., 2009, In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce
- 10.1207/s15374424jccp2602_4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2003.00352.x · DOI
- Koppejan-Luitze H. S., 2020, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 026540752097218
- 10.1007/s10680-021-09593-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/anzf.1091 · DOI
- 10.1037/0000116-000 · DOI
- Lyngstad J., 2014, At mothers, father or shared custody? Individual changes in children’s living arrangements when parents live separately in Norway
- 10.4324/9780203127537 · DOI
- 10.1177/0192513X18796051 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-23306-2_7 · DOI
- 10.1332/204674314X14017856302453 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01312.x · DOI
- 10.1111/fcre.12339 · DOI
- Rozin P., 2016, Hanbook of emotions
- 10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9780429242755 · DOI
- 10.1111/fcre.12294 · DOI
- 10.1002/anzf.1346 · DOI
- Stokkebekk J, 2022, Navigating prolonged conflict: Subject positions and meaning constructions in postdivorce families
- 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.04.021 · DOI
- 10.1111/jmft.12474 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1995.tb00281.x · DOI
- 10.1080/02668734.2016.1268197 · DOI
- 10.1080/09649069.2018.1493652 · DOI
- 10.1176/appi.books.9781615370306.md31 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Researching what we practice—The paradigm of systemic family research: Part 2
Whittaker, K., Stokkebekk, J., Lorås, L., & Tilden, T. (2023) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12921 · Cited by 12
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stokkebekk, J., Törrönen, J., Emery, R. E., Iversen, A. C., & Hollekim, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stokkebekk, Jan
- Venue
- Journal of Divorce & Remarriage
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-11-17
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 526-548
- ISSN
- 1050-2556 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4811
- OpenAlex
- W4319321804
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Divorce & Remarriage (publishedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- The Office for Children, Youth and Family Affairs (Bufetat), Norway
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- post-divorce conflict, father-child relationship, positioning theory, moral narratives, fatherhood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review