CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 143Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapist and client perceptions of therapeutic presence: The development of a measure

Geller, Shari Melissa, Greenberg, Leslie S., Watson, Jeanne Cherry·2010·Psychotherapy Research
DOI 10.1080/10503307.2010.495957
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The authors developed two versions of a therapeutic presence measure, based on an earlier model of presence (Geller & Greenberg, 2002)-Therapeutic Presence Inventory-therapist (TPI-T) and client (TPI-C) versions-to measure in-session therapeutic presence. They explored their reliability and validity in two studies. In the first, items generated from the previously established model were subjected to analyses and expert ratings. In the second study, therapists and clients rated therapists' presence postsession. Therapists also completed the Relationship Inventory, and clients assessed two additional factors: session outcome, using the Client Task Specific Measure-Revised, and therapeutic alliance, using the Working Alliance Inventory. Findings revealed that both versions of the TPI had good reliability and construct validity. However, TPI-T had low predictive validity and the TPI-C showed good predictive validity. In particular, clients reported positive therapeutic alliance and change following sessions when they felt their therapist was present with them.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2010.495957

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Barrett-Lennard , G. T. 1973 . Relationship Inventory . Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
  2. Beck , A. T. , Rush , A. J. , Shaw , B. F. and Emery , G. 1979 . Cognitive therapy of depression: A treatment manual , New York : Guilford Press .
  3. Bien , T. 2006 . Mindful therapy , Boston : Wisdom Publications .
  4. Cole , J. D. and Ladas-Gaskin , C. 2007 . Mindfulness centered therapies: An integrative approach , Seattle : Silver Birch Press .
  5. Geller , S. M. 2001 . Therapeutic presence: The development of a model and a measure . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, Toronto, Canada.
  6. 10.1080/14779757.2002.9688279 · DOI
  7. Geller , S. M. Greenberg , L. S. 2010 . Therapeutic presence: An essential way of being . Washington : APA . Manuscript in preparation .
  8. Greenberg , L. S. , Rice , L. N. and Elliott , R. 1993 . Facilitating emotional change: The moment-by-moment process , New York : Guilford Press .
  9. Greenberg , L. S. Rice , L. N. Watson , J. C. 1994 . Manual for client-centered therapy Unpublished manuscript, York University, Toronto.
  10. 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hycner , R. 1993 . Between person and person: Toward a dialogical psychotherapy , New York : Gestalt Journal Press .
  12. Hycner , R. and Jacobs , L. 1995 . The healing relationship in gestalt therapy: A dialogical/self psychology approach , New York : Gestalt Journal Press .
  13. Lambert , M. J. and Simon , W. 2008 . “ The therapeutic relationship: Central and essential in psychotherapy outcome ” . In Mindfulness and the therapeutic relationship , Edited by: Hick , S. F. and Bien , T. 19 – 33 . New York : Guilford Press .
  14. Safran , J. D. Crocker , P. McMain , S. Murray , P. 1990 , June . The therapeutic alliance rupture resolution and nonresolution events Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research Berkeley , CA .
  15. Schmid , P. F. 1998 . “Face to face”: The art of encounter ” . In Person-centered therapy: A European perspective , Edited by: Thorne , B. and Lambers , E. 74 – 90 . London : Sage .
  16. Shepherd , I. , Brown , E. and Greaves , G. 1972 . Three-on-oneness (presence) . Voices , 8 : 70 – 77 .
  17. Thorne , B. 1992 . Carl Rogers , London : Sage .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–143 of 143

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Geller, S. M., Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. C.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Geller, Shari Melissa
ORCID
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2010-09
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
599-610
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
DOI
10.1080/10503307.2010.495957
OpenAlex
W2134066496
Cited by
142
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
therapeutic presence, therapeutic relationship, predictive validity, construct validity, reliability statistics
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Major Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychological Tests, Psychotherapeutic Processes, Reproducibility of Results, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review