Therapist predictors of early patient-rated working alliance: a multilevel approach
Abstract
The present study investigated whether and how various therapists' (N = 68) self-reported characteristics relating to their therapeutic work predicted patients' (N = 335) early ratings of the working alliance in a naturalistic psychotherapy study. Results from multilevel modeling demonstrated that certain self-reports accounted well for the therapist effect in the early alliance. The effect of therapists' experiences of difficulties in practice was particularly strong: a negative influence of difficulties termed negative personal reaction (NPR) and a surprising positive influence of another factor, professional self-doubt (PSD), were found. The latter was interpreted as reflecting an attitude of therapist humbleness and sensitivity, which seems to facilitate alliance development. A negative impact of self-reported skills in using one's own and the patients' emotional reactions in the therapeutic relationship (advanced relational skills) was found when controlling for a warm interpersonal style. The negative effect of advanced relational skills depended on the level of NPR difficulties. The findings suggest that therapists should be cautious in using this kind of relational skill unless they experience relating to patients in a warm manner and report low levels of NPR in their practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Being nice in the short term is a counterproductive venture if one wants the patient to do well, at least in some therapies.
“In short, it is possible to conclude that 'being nice' in the short term is a counterproductive venture if one wants the patient to do well, at least in some therapies”
From Therapist drift redux: Why well-meaning clinicians fail to deliver evidence-based therapy, and how to get back on track (2016) · cites this paper as Nissen-Lie et al., 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 144
- Authors
- Nissen-Lie, H. A., Monsen, J. T., & Rønnestad, M. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Venue
- Psychotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 627-646
- ISSN
- 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4381
- OpenAlex
- W1971366616
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- therapeutic relationship, therapist characteristics, professional self-doubt, relationship skills, interpersonal warmth, alliance development
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Models, Psychological, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychiatry, Psychological Tests, Psychotherapy, Self-Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review