The professional and personal characteristics of effective psychotherapists: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Psychotherapists differ notably in the outcomes their patients achieve, and the characteristics that may explain these differences have attracted increasing interest. We systematically review studies on therapist pre-treatment characteristics predicting patient outcomes. Method: Systematic searches on databases for psychotherapy research, clinical psychology, and medical science for the years 2000–2018 identified published research examining therapist characteristics and psychotherapy outcomes. Of 2041 studies, 31 met inclusion criteria. Results: Findings show a few direct effects of therapist intrapersonal variables (e.g., self-relatedness, attachment) and several interaction effects with other constructs (e.g., patient pathology) on outcome. There is little support for the relevance of self-rated social skills. However, more consistent evidence has recently emerged for performance-based measurements of professional interpersonal skills, especially when elicited in challenging situations. Patient outcomes were also predicted by therapists’ self-rated professional characteristics, such as their experienced difficulties in practice, coping mechanisms, and attitudes towards therapeutic work, indicating that therapist self-perception also matters, although not always in the direction expected. Conclusions: More effective therapists seem characterized by professionally cultivated interpersonal capacities, which are likely rooted in their personal lives and attachment history. Research guidelines are proposed for moving this field forward (including larger samples, multilevel modeling, and in-depth qualitative work).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Few consistent predictors of patient outcomes have been identified among therapist characteristics explored.
“Although a wide range of candidate therapist characteristics have been explored (such as therapists attachment style152 and interpersonal skills153), few consistent predictors of patient outcomes have been identified154.”
From A common factors perspective on mindfulness-based interventions (2022) · cites this paper as [153]
Performance-based tasks assessing therapists' interpersonal skills have been shown to be the most consistent predictors of treatment outcome.
“Performance-based tasks assessing therapists’ interpersonal skills, for example where therapists are asked to respond to video vignettes of challenging patients153, have been shown to be the most consistent predictors of treatment outcome154,155.”
From A common factors perspective on mindfulness-based interventions (2022) · cites this paper as [153]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 292
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Baldwin, S. A., & Imel, Z. E. (2013). Therapist effects: Findings and methods. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. (6th ed.) (pp. 258-39). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Barkham, M., Lutz, W., Lambert, M. J., & Saxon, D. (2017). Therapist effects, effective therapists, and the law of variability. In L. G. Castonguay, & C. E. Hill (Eds.), How and why are some therapists better than others: Understanding therapist effects (pp. 13-23).
- Lambert, M. J. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed.) (pp. 169-219) Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Orlinsky, D. E., Strauss, B., Ronnestad, M. H., Hill, C., Castonguay, L., Willutzki, U., . . . Carlsson, J. (2015). A collaborative study of development in psychotherapy trainees. Psychotherapy Bulletin, 50, 21-4.
- Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1987). A generic model of psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative & Eclectic Psychotherapy, 6, 6-27.
- Orlinsky, D. E., Rønnestad, M. H., & Willutzki, U. (2004). Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed.) (pp. 307-393). New York: Wiley.
- Rønnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (2012). The developing practitioner: Growth and stagnation of therapists and counselors. New York: Routledge.
- Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work. (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
- Authors
- Heinonen, E., & Nissen-Lie, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Corresponding author
- Heinonen, Erkki
- ORCID
- Heinonen, Erkki
- Venue
- Psychotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-05-24
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 417-432
- ISSN
- 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4381
- OpenAlex
- W2945981774
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- WOS
- Funders
- Finnish Cultural Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- psychotherapy outcome, attachment, coping strategies, outcome prediction
- MeSH terms
- Psychotherapists, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Self Concept, Social Skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review