Cited by 95Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Efficacy of group psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Barkowski, Sarah, Schwartze, Dominique, Strauss, Bernhard, Burlingame, Gary M., Rosendahl, Jenny·2020·Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of group psychotherapy in the treatment of anxiety disorders. Method: A comprehensive literature search using PubMed, PsychInfo, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and manual searches was conducted to locate randomized controlled trials. We found 57 eligible studies ( k = 76 comparisons) including 3656 participants receiving group psychotherapy or an alternative treatment for generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. Results: Effect size estimates show that group psychotherapy reduces specific symptoms of anxiety disorders more effectively than no-treatment control groups ( g = 0.92, [0.81; 1.03], k = 43) and treatments providing common unspecific treatment factors ( g = 0.29 [0.10; 0.48], k = 12). No significant differences were found compared to individual psychotherapy ( g = 0.24 [-0.09; 0.57], k = 7) or pharmacotherapy ( g = -0.05 [-0.33; 0.23], k = 6). The effects were unrelated to factors of the group treatment. Within head-to-head studies, a significant moderating effect emerged for researcher allegiance. Conclusions: Our results support the efficacy of group psychotherapy for anxiety disorders. They indicate that mixed-diagnoses groups are equally effective as diagnosis-specific groups, although further evidence is required. Future primary studies should address differential effectiveness, include a wider range of therapeutic approaches as well as active comparison groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10503307.2020.1729440

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 93 · Cited by 95

Authors
Barkowski, S., Schwartze, D., Strauss, B., Burlingame, G. M., & Rosendahl, J.
Affiliations
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosendahl, Jenny
Venue
Psychotherapy Research
Published
2020-02-24
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
965-982
ISSN
  • 1050-3307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4381
OpenAlex
W3008342026
Cited by
95
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
group therapy, anxiety disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, treatment efficacy, individual psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, common factors
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Psychotherapy, Group

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review