The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Personality Disorders: Changes and Stability after Intensive Psychotherapy Focusing on Affect Consciousness
Abstract
Twenty-five patients participated in a prospective follow-up study at an outpatient psychotherapy unit specializing in treating patients with personality disorders and psychosis. The therapeutic approach was broadly based on object relations theory and psychodynamic self-psychology, and was focused in particular on affect consciousness, parental images, self-image and interpersonal relations. Mean duration of treatment was 25.4 months, and the mean follow-up period was 5.2 years. At termination of therapy, a statistically significant and substantial change was found in affect consciousness, characterological defenses, and symptoms. Moreover, 75% of the persons who had earlier fulfilled the DSM-III criteria for an axis I diagnosis no longer fulfilled these criteria. The reduction in axis II diagnoses was 72%. The patients who stayed in therapy for at least one year showed a change in rank ordering on the scales measuring affect consciousness and severity of personality disorder. At follow-up these patterns of change showed a high degree of stability. There was no significant change in mean levels of the tested variables, and the rank ordering of the individuals in the sample had remained highly stable over this period of time. The mean Health-Sickness Rating Scale (HSRS-global) was 72.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, 76% of the patients in the study did not meet the caseness criterion of the SCL-90-R's Global Severity Index at follow-up.”
From The Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2009) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“Monsen and colleagues 59,60 reported a reduction of DSM Axis I disorders of 75% at treatment termination and of 83% at follow-up, as rated by independent observers (mean = 79%).”
From The Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2009) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“In the study of Monsen and colleagues, 59,60 78% of all patients with Axis II diagnoses no longer met the criteria for that diagnosis at treatment termination, and 74% no longer met the criteria at follow-up.”
From The Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2009) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“In the study of Monsen and colleagues, 59,60 78% of all patients with Axis II diagnoses no longer met the criteria for that diagnosis at treatment termination, and 74% no longer met the criteria at follow-up.”
From The Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2009) · cites this paper as [60]
In the citing paper
“In psychotherapy for severe pathology (only four studies available), 48,59,60,68,69 the overall success rates were 61% both at termination and at follow-up.”
From The Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies (2009) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A Step in the Validation of a New Self-Report Scale
Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. F. (1976) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.128.3.280 · Cited by 2,298
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.7.1223 · Cited by 546
The Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies
de Maat, S., de Jonghe, F., Schoevers, R., & Dekker, J. (2009) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/10673220902742476 · Cited by 200
Karterud, S., Pedersen, G., Bjordal, E., Brabrand, J., Friis, S., Haaseth, Ø., Haavaldsen, G., Irion, T., Leirvåg, H., Tørum, E., et al. (2003) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.17.3.243.22151 · Cited by 178
MONSEN, J., ODLAND, T., FAUGLI, A., DAAE, E., & EILERTSEN, D. E. (1995) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1995.tb00985.x · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Monsen, J., Odland, T., Faugli, A., Daae, E., & Eilertsen, D.
- Affiliations
- a University of Oslo
- b Dikemark Hospital
- Venue
- Psychotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-48
- ISSN
- 1050-3307
- 1468-4381
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
