Motivation and Transfer: The Role of Mastery-Approach Goals in Preparation for Future Learning
Abstract
The study of knowledge transfer rarely draws upon motivational constructs in empirical work. We investigated how students' achievement goals interact with different forms of instruction to promote transfer, defined as preparation for future learning (Bransford & Schwartz, 1999 Bransford, J. D. and Schwartz, D. L. 1999. Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24: 61–100. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) Students were given either invention or tell-and-practice activities when learning statistics concepts and their achievement goal orientations were measured at the beginning of the experiment. We also assessed students' goals during the learning activity. We predicted that students who entered the experiment with a high mastery-approach goal orientation would be more likely to transfer, regardless of instruction. We also hypothesized that invention activities would lead to higher mastery-approach goal adoption for the task and more attention to important conceptual features, as students would focus on trying to understand the material. Finally, because we expected that invention activities would promote mastery goal adoption during the task, we predicted a moderating effect of invention activities, such that there would be a smaller effect for students' initial mastery-approach goal orientation on transfer for those who invented compared to those who received tell-and-practice instruction. All three h…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 79 · Cited by 195
- Authors
- Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, T. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Belenky, Daniel M.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 399-432
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2051418684
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 19.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Research Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
- Keywords
- knowledge transfer, mastery goals, achievement goals, invention activity, statistics learning, goal orientation, conceptual understanding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review