Cited by 17Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Prosocial Attitudes toward Money from Terror Management Perspective: Death Transcendence through Spirituality

Open access
Dong, Mengchen, Van Prooijen, Jan-Willem, Wu, Song, Zhang, Yanjun, Jin, Shenghua·2019·The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion

Abstract

Based on Terror Management Theory (TMT), we suggest that spirituality and prosocial attitudes toward money have a similar defensive function in resisting existential anxiety. In mortality salient (MS) situations, both spirituality and prosocial money attitudes afford symbolic immortality by self-transcendent connections. In four studies, we found that activating death awareness weakened people’s subjective love of money (Study 1) and predicted increased spending willingness on prosocial rather than proself goals (Studies 2, 3, and 4). More importantly, MS effects on money attitudes were smaller when people’s trait spirituality was high (vs. low; Studies 1, 2, 3) and when people were primed to experience spirituality (vs. happiness control condition; Study 4). For low spirituality people, the association between MS and prosocial spending also depended on the capacity of money spending to contribute positively to one’s feelings of self-worth (Study 3). Theoretical implications and future directions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10508619.2018.1532267

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 57 · Cited by 17

Authors
Dong, M., Van Prooijen, J.-W., Wu, S., Zhang, Y., & Jin, S.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Tibetan Academy of Social Science (CN)
  • Fuzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Jin, Shenghua
Venue
The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion
Published
2018-11-20
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 1050-8619 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7582
OpenAlex
W2901079384
Cited by
17
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal for the Psychology of Religion (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Social Science Foundation of China (13&ZD073)
  • The Major Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (13&ZD073)
  • The Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (16BSH098)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
terror management theory, money attitudes, mortality salience, death awareness, spirituality, existential anxiety, symbolic immortality, self-transcendence, self-worth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review