Intervention development study of the five-key model for reentry: An evidence-driven prisoner reentry intervention
Abstract
Over the past decade and a half, substantial resources were poured into the development of prisoner reentry programs. However, the excitement that surrounded the initial roll out of reentry programs has begun to wane from a lack of substantive change to the number of individuals who return to prison. Therefore, this article details the development of an intervention that can provide a new path forward for prisoner reentry programs. Informed by a rigorous process based on both theory and a thorough literature review of randomized controlled trials, evidence-driven interventions were identified and combined into a holistic reentry services approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The exclusion of a potentially large proportion of the prison population poses doubts regarding the suitability of mindfulness interventions for this setting.
“The exclusion of a potentially large proportion of the prison population poses doubts regarding the suitability of MIs for this setting (Pettus-Davis et al., 2019).”
From Group-based mindfulness interventions in prisons: a selective critical review (2024) · cites this paper as Pettus-Davis et al., 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 48 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Pettus-Davis, C., Renn, T., Veeh, C. A., & Eikenberry, J.
- Affiliations
- College of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA;
- Florida State University (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Offender Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-08-14
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 614-643
- ISSN
- 0364-3093 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-9674
- 1540-8558
- OpenAlex
- W2967967878
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Offender Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- prisoner reentry, prisoner reentry programs, intervention development, recidivism, evidence-based interventions, randomized controlled trials, reentry services, offender rehabilitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
