The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Another Decade of Social Scientific Work on Sex Work: A Review of Research 1990–2000
Abstract
The international, psychological and sociological research literature on prostitution from 1990 through 2000 is reviewed. The stage is set by scanning topics and perspectives in earlier writings. Then the research is discussed under the following headings: (a) HIV related research (HIV prevalence studies, factors in condom use, and prevention program evaluation); (b) workers' background and motivational issues (early victimization and connected factors, economic motives and connected factors); (c) work related issues (working routines, risks and stresses, and managing risk, work and identity); (d) research on clients, and (e) issues related to social and legal status. The literature is still much more about sex than it is about work. In addition, although an increasing number of authors have criticized the dominance of a deviance perspective over work perspectives on prostitution, the literature still reveals many features of stigmatization. For instance, the wrongs associated with sex work are all too often attributed to the nature of sex work itself instead of to the stigma attached to it or to specific negative circumstances. Likewise, the association between prostitution and negative features (in particular HIV and early victimization) is overwhelming, despite evidence that, for large groups of sex workers, these issues are of limited relevance. Generally, writers fail to adequately differentiate among types of sex workers. In particular, in relation to issues of health and well-being, differentiation among sex workers on the basis of specific features of their working situation (e.g., contexts, routines, relations, conditions) has hardly been studied and is recommended for the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure
Hochschild, A. R. (1979) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/227049 · Cited by 5,962
Prostitution, Power and Freedom
Davidson, J. (1998) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.10885 · Cited by 446
Cited by
Rekart, M. L. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67732-x · Cited by 503
What type of content are smartphone users addicted to?: SNS vs. games
Jeong, S.-H., Kim, H., Yum, J.-Y., & Hwang, Y. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.035 · Cited by 500
Weitzer, R. (2009) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120025 · Cited by 494
Perceived Risks and Benefits of Sex Work among Transgender Women of Color in San Francisco
Sausa, L. A., Keatley, J., & Operario, D. (2007) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9210-3 · Cited by 263
Nemoto, T., Bödeker, B., Iwamoto, M., & Sakata, M. (2014) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2013.841832 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanwesenbeeck, I.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 242-289
- ISSN
- 1053-2528 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1703226163
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Another Decade of Social Scientific Work on Sex Work: A Review of Research 1990–2000. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10532528.2001.10559799
- The paper
- Vanwesenbeeck, I. (2001). Another Decade of Social Scientific Work on Sex Work: A Review of Research 1990–2000. Annual Review of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2001.10559799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.