Cited by 109Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingChild Abuse and TraumaMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

The Construct of Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse: Conceptual and Measurement Issues

Bennett, Natalie, O’Donohue, William·2014·Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

There have been claims that some child molesters engage in a "seduction stage" prior to committing abuse. These behaviors, commonly known as "grooming," are understood as methods child molesters use to gain access to and prepare future victims to be compliant with abuse. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding exactly what this process entails and how it is clearly distinguished from normal adult-child interactions. It is important to devise an accurate definition of grooming for scientific, clinical, and forensic purposes. We critically evaluate the various definitions and reveal problematic heterogeneity. Furthermore, there are no methods of known psychometrics to validly assess grooming. We review the empirical literature regarding the occurrence of grooming and propose future directions for research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10538712.2014.960632

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is still only a relatively small body of empirical literature on sexual grooming and an ongoing debate about how to define sexual grooming exactly.

    “there is still only a relatively small body of empirical literature on the topic and an ongoing debate about how to define sexual grooming exactly (e.g., Bennett & O'Donohue, 2014; Winters; Kaylor, & Jeglic, 2022).”

    From 3.2 Sexual Online Grooming of Children – A Short Overview of the Offender Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Bennett & O'Donohue, 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, N., & O’Donohue, W.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
O’Donohue, William
Venue
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
Published
2014-11-17
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
957-976
ISSN
  • 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0679
OpenAlex
W1971250889
Cited by
109
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
grooming, child sexual abuse, child molesters, psychometric assessment, adult-child interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychometrics, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review