Cited by 51Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Advancing Child Sexual Abuse Prevention in Schools: An Exploration of the Effectiveness of the Enough!Online Training Program for K-12 Teachers

Gushwa, Melinda, Bernier, Jetta, Robinson, David·2019·Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

Child sexual abuse (CSA) in schools and educator misconduct represents a threat to the safety and well-being of our children. The Enough! Preventing Child Sexual Abuse in My School program is a 1-hour online training course developed to address the problem of sexual misconduct and CSA in K-12 education via the use of two avatars/teachers who are navigating CSA and misconduct in their schools. One hundred and thirty-four teachers from three school districts participated in a study to examine the effectiveness of the program in terms of knowledge awareness, including prevalence rates, types of CSA behaviors, impact of CSA on children, signs and symptoms, reporting responsibilities and responses to suspected abuse. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups: the intervention group (A) received the Enough! training and completed a pre-/posttest and an evaluation of the training (n = 61), Group B (control) completed the posttest only (n = 55), and Group C (control) completed both the pre- and posttests (n = 18). Results indicated that the intervention group's knowledge was significantly higher than that of the control group's at posttest. Group A participants reported a high level of satisfaction in the training, as well as increased knowledge, awareness and willingness to take action in the future. This study points to the need to further test the effectiveness of the Enough! program (and programs like it) on a wider-basis in an effort for educators to be better prepared to protect from the threat of CSA and sexual misconduct.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10538712.2018.1477000

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After training, surveyed teachers had significantly increased knowledge, awareness and willingness to take action on CSA in the future.

    “One study showed that compared to before the training they received, after training, surveyed teachers had significantly increased knowledge, awareness and willingness to take action on CSA in the future (Gushwa et al., 2019).”

    From Child abuse prevention education policies increase reports of child sexual abuse (2022) · cites this paper as Gushwa et al., 2019

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 51

Authors
Gushwa, M., Bernier, J., & Robinson, D.
Affiliations
Simmons University (US)
Corresponding author
Gushwa, Melinda
Venue
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
Published
2018-05-24
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
144-159
ISSN
  • 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0679
OpenAlex
W2804292016
Cited by
51
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse prevention, online teacher training, K-12 teachers, abuse detection, abuse reporting, teacher knowledge, school safety
MeSH terms
School Teachers, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Schools, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review