Advancing Child Sexual Abuse Prevention in Schools: An Exploration of the Effectiveness of the Enough!Online Training Program for K-12 Teachers
Abstract
Child sexual abuse (CSA) in schools and educator misconduct represents a threat to the safety and well-being of our children. The Enough! Preventing Child Sexual Abuse in My School program is a 1-hour online training course developed to address the problem of sexual misconduct and CSA in K-12 education via the use of two avatars/teachers who are navigating CSA and misconduct in their schools. One hundred and thirty-four teachers from three school districts participated in a study to examine the effectiveness of the program in terms of knowledge awareness, including prevalence rates, types of CSA behaviors, impact of CSA on children, signs and symptoms, reporting responsibilities and responses to suspected abuse. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups: the intervention group (A) received the Enough! training and completed a pre-/posttest and an evaluation of the training (n = 61), Group B (control) completed the posttest only (n = 55), and Group C (control) completed both the pre- and posttests (n = 18). Results indicated that the intervention group's knowledge was significantly higher than that of the control group's at posttest. Group A participants reported a high level of satisfaction in the training, as well as increased knowledge, awareness and willingness to take action in the future. This study points to the need to further test the effectiveness of the Enough! program (and programs like it) on a wider-basis in an effort for educators to be better prepared to protect from the threat of CSA and sexual misconduct.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After training, surveyed teachers had significantly increased knowledge, awareness and willingness to take action on CSA in the future.
“One study showed that compared to before the training they received, after training, surveyed teachers had significantly increased knowledge, awareness and willingness to take action on CSA in the future (Gushwa et al., 2019).”
From Child abuse prevention education policies increase reports of child sexual abuse (2022) · cites this paper as Gushwa et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Gushwa, M., Bernier, J., & Robinson, D.
- Affiliations
- Simmons University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gushwa, Melinda
- Venue
- Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-05-24
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-159
- ISSN
- 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-0679
- OpenAlex
- W2804292016
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse prevention, online teacher training, K-12 teachers, abuse detection, abuse reporting, teacher knowledge, school safety
- MeSH terms
- School Teachers, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Schools, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review