Sexual Abuse Prevention Education for Preschool-Aged Children: Parents’ Attitudes, Knowledge and Practices in Beijing, China
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate Chinese parents’ attitudes, knowledge, and practices with their preschool-aged children on sexual abuse prevention education, and to explore the associated factors of parental educative practices on child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention. Four hundred and forty parents of young children from 16 classes in 3 preschools in Beijing completed the questionnaire anonymously and voluntarily (response rate = 80%). Less than one third of parents believed that children most often were sexually abused by familiar persons, and less than 30% of parents believed that if a child has been sexually abused, there will usually be no obvious physical evidence. Parents were reluctant to discuss CSA protective skills with their young children. Less than half of the parents had told their children that if sexual abuse happens, parents or other trusted adults should be told. The multivariate linear regression equation showed that both parents’ knowledge (B = 0.11, SE B = 0.05, p = 0 .03) and attitudes (B = 0.27, SE B = 0.10, p = .01) were significant factors for parents’ communication about CSA prevention with their children. Findings from this study suggest that it is urgent to implement the sexual abuse prevention education with Chinese parents of preschoolers. Applications and limitations of these findings are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caregivers find it difficult to address CSA with their children.
“Despite positivity from parents, research on PLSAE suggests that caregivers find it difficult to address the issue with their children (Prikhidko & Kenny, 2021; Rudolph et al., 2018b; Rudolph & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2018b; Zhang et al., 2020).”
From Recall of sexual abuse prevention education at school and home: Associations with sexual abuse experience, disclosure, protective parenting, and knowledge (2022) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2020
Other studies have reported similar rates of PLSAE (Prikhidko & Kenny, 2021; Walsh et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2020).
“Other studies have reported similar rates (Prikhidko & Kenny, 2021; Walsh et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2020).”
From Recall of sexual abuse prevention education at school and home: Associations with sexual abuse experience, disclosure, protective parenting, and knowledge (2022) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Zhang, W., Ren, P., Yin, G., Li, H., & Jin, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Academy of Educational Sciences, Beijing, China
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Wenjing
- Venue
- Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-02-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-311
- ISSN
- 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-0679
- OpenAlex
- W3006020792
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse prevention, preschool children, parental attitudes, parental knowledge, parental practices, parent-child communication, disclosure of abuse, Chinese parents, Beijing
- MeSH terms
- Beijing, Adult, Child Abuse, Sexual, Child, Preschool, Female, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review