The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The household economics of rubber intercropping during the immature period in Northeast Thailand
Abstract
In order to alleviate poverty in Northeast Thailand, the Thai government has promoted rubber farming, which has expanded at the expense of annual crops. Because of a long immature period, planting rubber represents a loss of income for poor farmers in the very first years. This paper analyzed how rubber intercropping during the immature period helps farmers to compensate for this loss of income. Economic performances of the most widespread rubber farming systems were analyzed using information collected from a questionnaire addressed to 35 farmers in Buriram province. A sub-sample of 22 farmers was further interviewed to estimate the contribution of rubber intercropping in the formation of the total annual income during the immature period. The results showed that interest in rubber intercropping has grown, with cassava and rice as the main associated crops. With additional costs of about 14,169 ฿/ha/year over monospecific rubber plantations, rubber-cassava intercropping systems generated a gross margin estimated at 11,340 ฿/ha/year for a 3-year period. Compared to a monospecific rubber plantation, rubber-cassava intercropping systems reduced management costs by 59% over the 6-year period of rubber immaturity. The cash-income drawn from intercropping ranged from 0 to 26.8% of the household’s total annual income, which can be of considerable importance for low-income farmers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hougni et al. (2018) report that rubber and rice intercropping needs more family and total labour-day per hectare compared to the conventional monocropping system.”
From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Hougni et al. (2018)
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,904
Giller, K. E., Tittonell, P. A., Rufino, M. C., van Wijk, M. T., Zingore, S., Mapfumo, P., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Herrero, M., Chikowo, R., Corbeels, M., et al. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002 · Cited by 524
Fox, J., & Castella, J. (2013) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.750605 · Cited by 294
Babel, M. S., Agarwal, A., Swain, D. K., et al. (2010) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr00978 · Cited by 115
Rubber intercropping: a viable concept for the 21st century?
Langenberger, G., Cadisch, G., Martin, K., Min, S., & Waibel, H. (2016) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-016-9961-8 · Cited by 86
Factors determining intercropping by rubber smallholders in Sri Lanka: a logit analysis
Herath, P. H. M. U., & Takeya, H. (2003) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2003.tb00154.x · Cited by 73
Snoeck, D., Lacote, R., Kéli, J., et al. (2012) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.053 · Cited by 68
Cochet, H. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9828-0 · Cited by 58
Adoption of intercropping among smallholder rubber farmers in Xishuangbanna, China
Min, S., Huang, J., Bai, J., & Waibel, H. (2017) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.1080/14735903.2017.1315234 · Cited by 55
Access to livelihood capitals and propensity for entrepreneurship amongst rice farmers in Ghana
Mumuni, E., & Oladele, O. I. (2016) · Agriculture & Food Security · doi:10.1186/s40066-015-0049-x · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Bates D. M., 1992, Statistical Models
- Chambon B., 2013, Thaïlande, L’hévaculture continue sa progression chez le premier producteur mondial de caoutchouc naturel
- Chambon B., 2015, Study on the rubber farmers harvesting and post-harvest practices
- 10.1111/agec.2003.29.issue-2 · DOI
- Ogwuche P., 2012, Journal of Agriculture and Social Science, 8, 1
- Rantala, L. (2006).Rubber plantation performance in the Northeast and East of Thailand in relation to environmental conditions(70 p) (MSc Dissertation). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.
- Somboonsuke B., 2011, Contemporary Ob/Gyn, 56, 327
- Taillander P., 2011, Paper presented at the European Simulation and Modelling Conference, 138
- Thai Meteorological Department, 2016, Meteorological Data Sheet
- Tongkaemkaew U., 2013, Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 4, 497
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review
Mouratiadou, I., Wezel, A., Kamilia, K., Marchetti, A., Paracchini, M. L., & Bàrberi, P. (2024) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-024-00945-9 · Cited by 96
“For example, Hougni et al. (2018) report that rubber and rice intercropping needs more family and total labour-day per hectare compared to the conventional monocropping system.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hougni, D.-G. J. M., Chambon, B., Penot, E., & Promkhambut, A.
- Affiliations
- Institut National des Recherches Agricoles du Bénin (BJ)
- Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
- CIRAD/UMR Innovation, Montpellier, France
- Khon Kaen University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Hougni, Déo-Gratias J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Sustainable Forestry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-06-18
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 787-803
- ISSN
- 1054-9811 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-756X
- OpenAlex
- W2809171910
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Sustainable Forestry (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agropolis Fondation (Project 1502-203)
- Labex Agro (ANR-10-LABX-001-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural economics and policies
- Keywords
- rubber plantations, household income, gross margin, management costs, cassava, rice, poverty reduction, Northeast Thailand, Buriram Province, low-income farmers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review