The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COCO: a platform for comparing continuous optimizers in a black-box setting
Open accessAbstract
We introduce COCO, an open-source platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a black-box setting. COCO aims at automatizing the tedious and repetitive task of benchmarking numerical optimization algorithms to the greatest possible extent. The platform and the underlying methodology allow to benchmark in the same framework deterministic and stochastic solvers for both single and multiobjective optimization. We present the rationals behind the (decade-long) development of the platform as a general proposition for guidelines towards better benchmarking. We detail underlying fundamental concepts of COCO such as the definition of a problem as a function instance, the underlying idea of instances, the use of target values, and runtime defined by the number of function calls as the central performance measure. Finally, we give a quick overview of the basic code structure and the currently available test suites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
Stevens, S. S. (1946) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 · Cited by 4,761
Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies
Hansen, N., & Ostermeier, A. (2001) · Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1162/106365601750190398 · Cited by 4,397
Self-citation
Cited by
Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges
Bischl, B., Binder, M., Lang, M., Pielok, T., Richter, J., Coors, S., Thomas, J., Ullmann, T., Becker, M., Boulesteix, A., et al. (2023) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1484 · Cited by 930
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, N., Auger, A., Ros, R., Mersmann, O., Tušar, T., & Brockhoff, D.
- Venue
- Optimization Methods and Software
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-08-25
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 114-144
- ISSN
- 1026-7670 (ISSN-L)
- 1055-6788
- 1029-4937
- OpenAlex
- W2314046539
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COCO: a platform for comparing continuous optimizers in a black-box setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10556788.2020.1808977
- The paper
- Hansen, N., Auger, A., Ros, R., Mersmann, O., Tušar, T., & Brockhoff, D. (2021). COCO: a platform for comparing continuous optimizers in a black-box setting. Optimization Methods and Software. https://doi.org/10.1080/10556788.2020.1808977
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.