CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Rhetoric and Communication StudiesHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesGender Politics and Representation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The woman suffrage parades of 1910–1913: Possibilities and limitations of an early feminist rhetorical strategy

Borda, Jennifer L.·2002·Western Journal of Communication
DOI 10.1080/10570310209374724
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This essay offers a greater understanding of how the introduction of annual parades into the woman suffrage movement created both rhetorical possibilities and limitations for the women's campaign. Through an analysis of suffragists' use of the parades as an innovative rhetorical strategy with formal limitations, I argue that the parades ultimately were successful in drawing attention to arguments for woman suffrage, but proved problematic for achieving the movement's goals, particularly suffragists' efforts to control the image of their movement and its members. I conclude with a consideration of how the parades' contradictions reflected the larger rhetorical paradox inherent in early twentieth‐century gender politics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10570310209374724

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 1913, The New York Times, 5
  2. 1913, The New York Times, 1
  3. 1912, The New York Herald, 1+
  4. 1912, New York Tribune, 1+
  5. 1913, The New York Times, 16
  6. 1913, The New York Herald, 1 +
  7. 1911, New‐York Daily Tribune, 1+
  8. Blatch Harriot Stanton, 1898, Woman's Journal, 114
  9. Blatch Harriot Stanton, 1896, Gunton's Magazine, 350
  10. _____, 1912, New York Tribune, 1
  11. Brown Harriet Connor, 1913, History of Women
  12. Campbell Karlyn Kohrs, 1989, Man Cannot Speak For Her, Vol I: A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric
  13. Davis Susan G., 1986, Parades and Power: Street Theater in Nineteenth‐Century Philadelphia
  14. 1913, New York Tribune, 6
  15. Finnegan Margaret, 1999, Selling Suffrage: Consumer Culture & Votes for Women
  16. Isenberg Nancy, 1998, Sex & Citizenship in Antebellum America
  17. Irwin Inez Haynes, 1977, The Story of Alice Paul and the National Women's Party. 1964
  18. 1912, New York Tribune, 2
  19. Mayo Edith, 1995, Jailed for Freedom: American Women Win the Vote
  20. 1913, The New York Herald, 1
  21. Ryan Mary, 1989, The New Cultural History, 131
  22. 1913, The New York Herald, 2
  23. Stevens Doris, 1995, Jailed for Freedom: American Women Win the Vote. 1920
  24. 1912, The New York Times, 1
  25. 1908, The Woman's Journal, 30
  26. 1912, The New York Times, 1
  27. 1912, The New York Times, 7
  28. 1908, The New York Times, 7
  29. 1911, The New York Times, 13
  30. 1911, The New York Times, 5
  31. 1913, The New York Herald, 2
  32. Tinnin Glenna Smith, 1913, The Woman's Journal, 60
  33. 1912, The New York Times, 22
  34. 1912, The New York Times, 7
  35. 1911, The New York Times, 1

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Borda, J. L.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Borda, Jennifer L.
ORCID
Borda, Jennifer L.
Venue
Western Journal of Communication
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2002-03
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
25-52
ISSN
  • 1057-0314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1027
DOI
10.1080/10570310209374724
OpenAlex
W2016376023
Cited by
31
References
43
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Western Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
Keywords
women's suffrage, rhetorical strategies, early feminism, gender politics, suffragists, public demonstrations, 1910s

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review