Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 56Attachment and Relationship DynamicsLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesInterpersonal and Organizational Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Satisfying communication and relationship labels: Intimacy and length of relationship as perceptual frames of naturalistic conversations

Hecht, Michael L.·1984·Western Journal of Speech Communication

Abstract

This study examines the role of relationship labels as perceptual frames of satisfying communication. Differentiating normative and outcome‐based approaches, it was hypothesized that different relationship labels would be associated with different types of satisfying communication. Naturalistic conversations were interrupted in two geographically distinct samples and interactants assessed relationship intimacy and length, and satisfying communication. Cross‐validated regressions indicated significant associations with satisfaction across samples for intimacy and within each sample for length.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10570318409374157

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Rogers Carl R., 1961, On Becoming a Person
  2. Maslow Abraham H., 1970, Motivation and Personality
  3. Snyder Douglas K., 1979, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 813, 10.2307/351481 · DOI
  4. Thibaut John W., 1959, The Social Psychology of Groups
  5. Kraut Robert E., 1982, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 7l8, 10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.78 · DOI
  6. McLaughlin Margaret L., 1982, Human Communication Research, 8, 299, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00669.x · DOI
  7. Hecht Michael, International Journal of Intercultural Relations
  8. Vause Corrinne J., 1981, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 241, 10.1080/10570318109374046 · DOI
  9. Lawler Edward, 1968, Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 432, 10.1037/h0026504 · DOI
  10. Korzenny Felipe, 1981, Communication Research, 8, 479, 10.1177/009365028100800405 · DOI
  11. Hecht Michael L., 1978, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 47, 10.1080/00335637809383411 · DOI
  12. Knapp Mark L., 1980, Communication Monographs, 47, 262, 10.1080/03637758009376036 · DOI
  13. Watzlawick Paul, 1967, Pragmatics of Human Communication
  14. Miller Gerald R., 1975, Between People: A New Analysis of Interpersonal Communication
  15. Pearce W. Barnett, 1973, Journal of Communication, 23, 160, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1973.tb00940.x · DOI
  16. Fitzpatrick Mary Anne, 1982, Human Communication Research, 8, 195, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1982.tb00664.x · DOI
  17. Rubin Rebecca Boring, 1977, Communication Monographs, 44, 81, 10.1080/03637757709390117 · DOI
  18. Keiser George J., 1976, Human Communication Research, 2, 147, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00707.x · DOI
  19. Cozby Paul C., 1973, Psychological Bulletin, 79, 73, 10.1037/h0033950 · DOI
  20. Altman Irwin, 1973, Social Penetration
  21. Wilmot William W., 1975, Dyadic Communication: A Transactional Perspective
  22. Knapp Mark L., 1978, Social Intercourse: From Greeting to Goodbye
  23. Triandis Harry C., 1968, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 1, 10.1037/h0025585 · DOI
  24. Marwell Gerald, 1970, American Sociological Review, 35, 884, 10.2307/2093299 · DOI
  25. Taylor Dalmas A., 1966, Psychological Reports, 19, 729, 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.3.729 · DOI
  26. Ellis Donald G., 1980, Western Journal of Speech Communication, 44, 105
  27. Wright Paul H., 1978, Human Communication Research, 4, 196, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00609.x · DOI
  28. Wanous John P., 1972, Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 95, 10.1037/h0032664 · DOI
  29. Wiemann John M., 1977, Human Communication Research, 3, 195, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00518.x · DOI
  30. Cegala Donald J., 1982, Communication Monographs, 49, 229, 10.1080/03637758209376087 · DOI

Cited by

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
Hecht, M. L.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hecht, Michael L.
Venue
Western Journal of Speech Communication
Published
1984-12
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
201-216
ISSN
0193-6700 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043194741
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Western Journal of Speech Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Interpersonal and Organizational Communication
Keywords
relationship intimacy, relationship duration, naturalistic conversation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Satisfying communication and relationship labels: Intimacy and length of relationship as perceptual frames of naturalistic conversations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10570318409374157
The paper
Hecht, M. L. (1984). Satisfying communication and relationship labels: Intimacy and length of relationship as perceptual frames of naturalistic conversations. Western Journal of Speech Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318409374157

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.