Social Media in Technical Communication
Abstract
This special issue addresses social media and their effects on the field of technical communication. Through various methodologies and distinct sites of inquiry—from research into ways knowledge workers use specific social media sites, to collaborations by scholars across the globe using social media and other technologies, to classroom practices that investigate social media—contributors consider the imbricated nature of social media in public life and its significance to our work as researchers and teachers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strand 1 also offers useful concepts for professional communication, which has studied peer and social production in open source software, Wikipedia, other peer production sites, and social media.
“Yet Strand 1 also offers productive concepts for professional communication, which has examined peer and social production in open source software and support, Wikipedia, and other peer production sites, and social media [24][30] [31].”
From Fourth-Generation Activity Theory: An Integrative Literature Review and Implications for Professional Communication (2019) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spinuzzi, C., & Guile, D. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) · doi:10.1109/procomm.2019.00012 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kimme Hea, A. C.
- Venue
- Technical Communication Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-12-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 1057-2252 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-7625
- OpenAlex
- W2100550583
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Technical Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Keywords
- social media, technical communication, knowledge workers, scholarly collaboration, teaching practice, research practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
