The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Boko Haram's Conquest for the Caliphate: How Al Qaeda Helped Islamic State Acquire Territory
Abstract
This article explains how Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM)–trained Nigerian militants split from Boko Haram and formed a new group called Ansaru in 2011 after consulting with AQIM. Ansaru leaders, however, reintegrated with Boko Haram and transferred their specialized skills in kidnappings, suicide bombings, and media to Boko Haram and contributed to the group's conquest of territory in 2013. Al Qaeda did not benefit from these conquests because Ansaru leaders switched loyalties and helped arrange Boko Haram's pledge to Islamic State in 2015. This article exploits primary source documents from AQIM, Islamic State, and Boko Haram and contributes to the literature on splits and mergers and knowledge transfer between terrorist groups and Al Qaeda–Islamic State competition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Forces of Terror: Armed Banditry and Insecurity in North-west Nigeria
Ojo, J. S., Oyewole, S., & Aina, F. (2023) · Democracy and Security · doi:10.1080/17419166.2023.2164924 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Zenn, J.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zenn, Jacob
- ORCID
- Zenn, Jacob
- Venue
- Studies in Conflict & Terrorism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-03-13
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-122
- ISSN
- 1057-610X (ISSN-L)
- 1521-0731
- OpenAlex
- W2789655483
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Conflict and Terrorism (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African Studies and Geopolitics
- Keywords
- Boko Haram, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Islamic State, knowledge transfer, territorial conquest, suicide bombings, kidnapping
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.