The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration
Abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated a strong empirical relationship between political discussion and political knowledge. However, as of yet there has been no clear discussion or demonstration of how political discussion translates into increased political knowledge. The present study proposes three explanations--exposure (similar to the two step flow), anticipatory elaboration (linking work on uses and gratifications and news information processing), and discussion-generated elaboration (focusing on how discussion itself can influence information processing)--for this observed empirical relationship. In order to test these three explanations, data from the 2000 ANES and a local community survey during the 1996 presidential election were employed. Findings suggest that the direct relationship between discussion and knowledge may be mediated through motivations and information processing behaviors. These findings support the anticipatory elaboration and discussion-generated elaboration explanations while questioning the exposure explanation, and link well with recent findings on the cognitive mediation model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Good News for the Future? Young People, Internet Use, and Political Participation
Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210381738 · Cited by 594
Campaigns, Reflection, and Deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R Model of Communication Effects
Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x · Cited by 361
Hyun, K. D., & Kim, J. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.994543 · Cited by 131
Ida, R., Saud, M., & Mashud, M. (2020) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-020-00985-9 · Cited by 73
Park, C. S., & Kaye, B. K. (2018) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699017753149 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- EVELAND, Jr.
- Venue
- Political Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-193
- ISSN
- 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7675
- OpenAlex
- W2069588455
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10584600490443877
- The paper
- EVELAND, Jr. (2004). The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration. Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600490443877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.