The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research
Open accessAbstract
Scholars disagree about the impact of the Internet on civic and political engagement. Some scholars argue that Internet use will contribute to civic decline, whereas other scholars view the Internet as having a role to play in reinvigorating civic life. This article assesses the hypothesis that Internet use will contribute to declines in civic life. It also assesses whether Internet use has any significant effect on engagement. A meta-analysis approach to current research in this area is used. In total, 38 studies with 166 effects are examined. The meta-data provide strong evidence against the Internet having a negative effect on engagement. However, the meta-data do not establish that Internet use will have a substantial impact on engagement. The effects of Internet use on engagement seem to increase nonmonotonically across time, and the effects are larger when online news is used to measure Internet use, compared to other measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide
Norris, P. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164887 · Cited by 2,921
Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
Bimber, B. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615573 · Cited by 526
Online and in the know: uses and gratifications of the web for political information
Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2002) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_4 · Cited by 492
Cited by
Fact-checking: a meta-analysis of what works and for whom
Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894 · Cited by 690
Good News for the Future? Young People, Internet Use, and Political Participation
Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210381738 · Cited by 594
Media effects: theory and research
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Walther, J. B. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608 · Cited by 536
Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections
Cancela, J., & Geys, B. (2016) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005 · Cited by 452
Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., & Pang, N. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444815616221 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Boulianne, S.
- Venue
- Political Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-05-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 193-211
- ISSN
- 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7675
- OpenAlex
- W2090969900
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 35.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10584600902854363
- The paper
- Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research. Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600902854363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
