The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Media and Political Agenda Setting
Open accessAbstract
What is the role of social media in political agenda setting? Digital platforms have reduced the gatekeeping power of traditional media and, potentially, they have increased the capacity of various kinds of actors to shape the agenda. We study this question in the Swiss context by examining the connections between three agendas: the traditional media agenda, the social media agenda of parties, and the social media agenda of politicians. Specifically, we validate and apply supervised machine learning classifiers to categorize 2.78 million articles published in 84 newspapers, 6,500 tweets posted on official party accounts, and 210,000 tweets posted by politicians on their own accounts from January 2018 until December 2019. We first use the classifier to measure the salience of the four most relevant issues of the period: the environment, Europe, gender equality, and immigration. Then, using a vector autoregression (VAR) approach, we analyze the relationship between the three agendas. Results show that not only do the traditional media agenda, the social media agenda of parties, and the social media agenda of politicians influence one another but, overall, no agenda leads the others more than it is led by them. There is one important exception: for the environment issue, the social media agenda of parties is more predictive of the traditional media agenda than vice-versa. These findings underscore how closely different agendas are tied together, but also show that advocacy campaigns may play an important role in both constraining and enabling parties to push their specific agendas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,225
The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267990 · Cited by 9,537
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro
Oh, J.-M., Venters, C. C., Di, C., Pinto, A. M., Wan, L., Younis, I., Cai, Z., Arai, C., So, B. R., Duan, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 · Cited by 7,157
Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952796 · Cited by 3,387
A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties
Strom, K. (1990) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111461 · Cited by 1,687
Géron, A. (2017) · Cited by 1,443
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Chadwick, A. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001 · Cited by 1,174
The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x · Cited by 1,002
The hybrid media system: politics and power
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-6974 · Cited by 841
Cited by
Ethical implications of text generation in the age of artificial intelligence
Illia, L., Colleoni, E., & Zyglidopoulos, S. (2023) · Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility · doi:10.1111/beer.12479 · Cited by 128
Between calls for action and narratives of denial: Climate change attention structures on Twitter
Meyer, H., Peach, A. K., Guenther, L., Kedar, H. E., & Brüggemann, M. (2023) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v11i1.6111 · Cited by 33
Few voices, strong echo: Measuring follower homogeneity of politicians’ Twitter accounts
Rusche, F. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221099860 · Cited by 6
Tucker, J. A. (2023) · Handbook of Computational Social Science for Policy · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16624-2_20 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S.
- Venue
- Political Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-60
- ISSN
- 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-7675
- OpenAlex
- W3158066160
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 75.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Media and Political Agenda Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
- The paper
- Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022). Social Media and Political Agenda Setting. Political Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.