The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of the Evidence Regarding the Carcinogenicity of Hexavalent Chromium in Drinking Water
Abstract
Recent analyses have revealed that 38% of municipal sources of drinking water in California have detectable levels of hexavalent chromium. This observation provided new impetus to characterize the carcinogenic risk associated with oral exposure to hexavalent chromium in drinking water. Notwithstanding the well-characterized increases in cancer associated with inhalation exposure to this chemical, the marked reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium in the stomach suggests that exposure to hexavalent chromium in drinking water may not pose a carcinogenic risk. A reevaluation of studies that investigated the toxicokinetics, the genotoxicity, and the mechanism of carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium, as well as the available human and animal cancer studies, was undertaken to determine if there is evidence that exposure to this chemical in drinking water may pose a carcinogenic risk. Mechanistic studies suggest the potential for a carcinogenic response if hexavalent chromium enters cells. Both toxicokinetic and genotoxicity studies indicate that a portion of an orally administered dose of hexavalent chromium is absorbed and gets into cells of several tissues, causing DNA damage. The only lifetime oral study of hexavalent chromium in animals conducted thus far yielded a statistically significant increase in stomach tumors compared to controls. Also, in a limited-term cancer study, co-exposure to hexavalent chromium in drinking water and ultraviolet light produced skin tumors in mice. The only available cancer study of humans exposed to hexavalent chromium in drinking water revealed a statistically significant increase in stomach tumors. Moreover, a meta-analysis of occupational studies also revealed a statistically significant increase in stomach cancers. The increases in stomach tumors in both human and animal studies, along with the toxicokinetic, genotoxic, and mechanistic data, suggest that oral exposure to this agent appears to pose a carcinogenic risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electrically Regenerated Ion Exchange for Removal and Recovery of Cr(VI) from Wastewater
Xing, Y., Chen, X., & Wang, D. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es061499l · Cited by 313
Rong, M., Lin, L., Song, X., Wang, Y., Zhong, Y., Yan, J., Feng, Y., Zeng, X., & Chen, X. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.12.024 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- SEDMAN, R. M., BEAUMONT, J., MCDONALD, T. A., REYNOLDS, S., KROWECH, G., & HOWD, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-182
- ISSN
- 1059-0501 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2045374242
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of the Evidence Regarding the Carcinogenicity of Hexavalent Chromium in Drinking Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10590500600614337
- The paper
- SEDMAN, R. M., BEAUMONT, J., MCDONALD, T. A., REYNOLDS, S., KROWECH, G., & HOWD, R. (2006). Review of the Evidence Regarding the Carcinogenicity of Hexavalent Chromium in Drinking Water. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590500600614337
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.