The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Russian Education Policy From the Late 1980s Through the Early 2000s: Declarations and the Practical Impact on Inequality in K–12 Education
Abstract
We discuss the results of a study of Russian educational policy from the late 1980s to the early 2000s in connection with the emerging trends of educational inequality in the field of K–12 education. A statistical analysis of data on educational organizations, content analysis of documents, and a review of legislation and materials collected during expert interviews all show that the public policy of universal equality of educational opportunities that was declared throughout the period under review in practice was not provided with any legal or organizational support. At the same time, the implemented components of the liberal and neoliberal approaches in educational administration led to the growth of educational inequality (by stratifying schools by their level of resource provision and the quality of educational outcomes). At the same time, the economic and social conditions in post-Soviet Russia had a significant impact on the nature and practical effect of these components of administrative policy. This process has revealed the specifics of the Russian experience of neoliberal reforms in K–12 education and their adverse impact on educational inequality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to Kosaretsky et al. (2016), the greatest inequality in educational access in the Russian Federation was observed in the 1990s, where the rising number of educational inequalities was largely determined by the accelerating socioeconomic strati fi cation of the population, as well as signi fi cant budget cuts to education.”
From Socioeconomic Inequality and Educational Outcomes (2019) · cites this paper as Kosaretsky et al. 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1080/03050060120091229 · DOI
- Cherednichenko G.V., 1999, Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 5
- 10.1080/713656615 · DOI
- Forsey M., 2007, Education Policy in Practice: Critical Cultural Studies
- Froumin I.D., 2013, Razvitiye chelovecheskogo kapitala – novaya sotsial’naya politika, 105
- 10.1086/230755 · DOI
- Harvey D., 2005, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, 10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Hirsh E.D., 2010, The Schools We Need and Why We Don’t Have Them
- 10.1257/aer.90.5.1209 · DOI
- Hoxby C.M., 2003, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10, 9
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226355344.001.0001 · DOI
- Hursh D., 2003, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 1, 30
- Ionin L.G., 1989, Zakony Parkinsona, 426
- 10.1177/0011392110368003 · DOI
- Kliebard H., 1986, The Struggle for the American Curriculum 1893–1958
- Kolesnikova, E.M. Demonopolizatsiya rynka obrazovatel’nykh uslug v postsovetskoy Rossii. Sotsiologiya obrazovaniya: Khrestomatiya . Moscow: VShE, 2008, pp. 207–217.
- Konstantinovskiy D.L., 2010, Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo, 40
- Konstantinovskiy D.L., 2006, Dostupnost’ kachestvennogo obshchego obrazovaniya: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya
- Kosaretsky S., 2014, “School System and Educational Policy in a Highly Stratified Post-Soviet Society: the Importance of Social Context. Working paper WP BRP 22/PA/2014.”
- 10.1080/713656612 · DOI
- Machin S., 2006, Education Policy in the UK
- Merzhoeva A.Kh, 2011, Sotsial’no-filosofskiy analiz problem sotsial’noy selektsii v rossiyskoy sisteme obshchego obrazovaniya
- Pinskaya M.A., 2013, Narodnoye obrazovaniye, 11
- Pinskaya М., 2013, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3, 5
- Radaev V.V., 1991, Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya, 50
- Reimers F., 2000, Unequal Schools, Unequal Chances: The Challenges To Equal Opportunity in the Americas
- Rybakov S.V., 2011, Obozrevatel’, 260, 35
- Shelestyuk E.V., 2013, Inostrannyy yazyk v sisteme srednego i vysshego obrazovaniya. Materialy III mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, 1–2 oktyabrya 2013 goda. Prague: Vedecko vydavatelske centrum “Sociosfera-CZ,”, 71
- Shishkin S.V., 2005, Universitetskoye upravleniye, 34, 80
- Shkaratan O.I., 2004, Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 49
- Sholokhov A.V., 2009, Obrazovatel’noye neravenstvo: sotsial’no-filosofskiy analiz. Ta-ganrog: Izd-vo TTI YuFU
- Whitty G., 1998, Devolution and Choice in Education: The School, The State and The Market
- Yastrebov G., 2014, “Contextualizing Academic Performance in Russian Schools: School Characteristics, the Composition of Student Body and Local Deprivation. Working paper WP BRP55/SOC/2014.”
- Yastrebov G.A., 2014, Voprosy obrazovaniya, 90
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Socioeconomic Inequality and Educational Outcomes
Broer, M., Bai, Y., & Fonseca, F. (2019) · IEA Research for Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11991-1 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Kosaretsky, S., Grunicheva, I., & Goshin, M.
- Affiliations
- National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
- Venue
- Russian Education & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 732-756
- ISSN
- 1060-9393 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0423
- OpenAlex
- W2756454411
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- new_edition (2019-10-31)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Russian Education & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Education Systems and Policies
- Keywords
- Russian education policy, educational inequality, K-12 education, neoliberalism in education, educational management, school stratification, post-Soviet Russia, educational equality, educational outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
