Modeling the types and timing of stress in pregnancy
Abstract
In the current study we examined whether or not stress at critical intervals during pregnancy, or stress consistently experienced across the course of pregnancy was associated with gestational age in a (large) multiethnic sample. After deriving a latent trait-state model of stress, we examined whether or not particular components of stress (i.e., perceived stress, general anxiety, pregnancy-specific anxiety), or stress in general, at specific time points or over time were associated with gestational age. Pregnancy-specific anxiety over the course of pregnancy was associated with shorter gestation after controlling for a number of risk factors, including history of diabetes, smoking, maternal age, and parity. Moreover, these findings suggest that the relation between pregnancy-specific anxiety and gestational age was similar across ethnic groups. The importance of modeling the components and timing of stress with latent variable methodology is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pregnancy anxiety is a more sensitive predictor of birth outcomes than general anxiety.
“Pregnancy anxiety has been suggested to be a more sensitive predictor of birth outcomes than general anxiety (Wadhwa et al., 1993; DiPietro et al., 2004; Roesch et al., 2004; Kramer et al., 2009)”
From High pregnancy anxiety during mid-gestation is associated with decreased gray matter density in 6-9-year-old children. (2010) · cites this paper as Roesch et al., 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 163
- Authors
- Roesch, S. C., Schetter, C. D., Woo, G., & Hobel, C. J.
- Affiliations
- San Diego State University (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roesch, Scott C.
- Venue
- Anxiety, Stress & Coping
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-102
- ISSN
- 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2205
- OpenAlex
- W2160606188
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Keywords
- pregnancy, stress, gestational age, pregnancy-specific anxiety, perceived stress, general anxiety, ethnic differences, smoking, parity, diabetes mellitus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review