Human freezing in response to affective films.
Abstract
Human freezing has been objectively assessed using a passive picture viewing paradigm as an analog for threat. These results should be replicated for other stimuli in order to determine their stability and generalizability. Affective films are used frequently to elicit affective responses, but it is unknown whether they also elicit freezing-like defense responses. To test whether this is the case, 50 participants watched neutral, pleasant and unpleasant film fragments while standing on a stabilometric platform and wearing a polar band to assess heart rate. Freezing-like responses (indicated by overall reduced body sway and heart rate deceleration) were observed for the unpleasant film only. The unpleasant film also elicited early reduced body sway (1-2 s after stimulus onset). Heart rate and body sway were correlated during the unpleasant film only. The results suggest that ecologically valid stimuli like films are adequate stimuli in evoking defense responses. The results also underscore the importance of including time courses in human experimental research on defense reactions in order to delineate different stages in the defense response.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the insula is involved in neural representations of body state-including acute sympathetic arousal-increased activity there reflects the individual's hyperaroused body state.
“And because the insula is involved in neural representations of body state—including acute sympathetic arousal—increased activity there reflects the individual’s hyperaroused body state.54,57,59”
From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Hagenaars, M. A., Roelofs, K., & Stins, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Hagenaars, Muriel A.
- Venue
- Anxiety, Stress, & Coping
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-06-27
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-37
- ISSN
- 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-2205
- OpenAlex
- W2162999265
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (453-12-001, #452-07-008)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- threats, defense response, postural sway, heart rate, unpleasant stimuli, ecological validity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Affect, Anxiety, Arousal, Defense Mechanisms, Postural Balance, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Motion Pictures, Orientation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review