The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Multivariate Matching Methods: Structures, Distances, and Algorithms
Abstract
A comparison and evaluation is made of recent proposals for multivariate matched sampling in observational studies, where the following three questions are answered: (1) Algorithms: In current statistical practice, matched samples are formed using “nearest available” matching, a greedy algorithm. Greedy matching does not minimize the total distance within matched pairs, though good algorithms exist for optimal matching that do minimize the total distance. How much better is optimal matching than greedy matching? We find that optimal matching is sometimes noticeably better than greedy matching in the sense of producing closely matched pairs, sometimes only marginally better, but it is no better than greedy matching in the sense of producing balanced matched samples. (2) Structures: In common practice, treated units are matched to one control, called pair matching or 1–1 matching, or treated units are matched to two controls, called 1–2 matching, and so on. It is known, however, that the optimal structure is a full matching in which a treated unit may have one or more controls or a control may have one or more treated units. Optimal 1 — k matching is compared to optimal full matching, finding that optimal full matching is often much better. (3) Distances: Matching involves defining a distance between covariate vectors, and several such distances exist. Three recent proposals are compared. Practical advice is summarized in a final section.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Anderson , T. 1984 . An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, , second ed. , New York : John Wiley .
- Bertsekas , D. 1991 . Linear Network Optimization: Algorithms and Codes , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
- 10.1093/biomet/64.2.299 · DOI
- Cochran , W. G. 1965 . “The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations” . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , 128 : 134 – 155 . (with discussion), Ser. A
- Cochran , W. G. and Rubin , D. B. 1973 . “Controlling Bias in Observational Studies: A Review” . Sankya , 35 : 417 – 446 . Ser. A
- 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90391-X · DOI
- Gu , X. 1992 . “A Comparison and Evaluation of Recent Developments for Multivariate Matching in Observational Studies” , University of Pennsylvania, Department of Statistics . unpublished Ph.D. thesis
- 10.2307/1165073 · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/75.3.577 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478868 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01848.x · DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383 · DOI
- 10.2307/2529685 · DOI
- Rubin , D. B. 1976 . “Multivariate Matching Methods That are Equal Percent Bias Reducing, I: Some Examples” . Biometrics , 32 : 185 – 203 .
- 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482513 · DOI
- 10.2307/2529981 · DOI
- 10.2307/2529548 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1137/0208036 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 595
Zhang, Y., Lin, L., Starkopf, L., Chen, J., & Wang, W. W. B. (2021) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106492 · Cited by 7
Kang, Y.-J., Lee, M., Kim, M.-S., You, S., Lee, J.-E., Eom, J.-H., & Jung, S. (2021) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.1007/s40266-021-00872-4 · Cited by 7
“A greedy matching algorithm was used to obtain the four closest controls [25].”
MethodCharytan, D., Zelevinsky, K., Wolf, R., & Normand, S. (2021) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2021.03.882 · Cited by 6
“Differences #10% were considered negligible.(12) Baseline, postmatch characteristics, and standardized differences are presented for 1 of 5 imputed data sets for illustrative purposes.”
BackgroundSelection Bias in Observational Studies of Palliative Care: Lessons Learned.
Kaufman, B. G., Houtven, C. V., Greiner, M. A., Hammill, B., Harker, M., Anderson, D. M., Petry, S., Bull, J., & Taylor, D. (2020) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.011 · Cited by 6
Jin, H. J., & Cho, S. (2020) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.08.004 · Cited by 9
Learning Causal Effect Using Machine Learning with Application to China’s Typhoon
Wu, P., Hu, Q., Tong, X., & Wu, M. (2020) · Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica English Series · doi:10.1007/s10255-020-0960-1 · Cited by 3
“The Mahalanobis can work quite well when there are relatively few covariates, but it may fail when the covariates are not normally distributed or the number of covariates is large [17, 42] .”
BackgroundA brief introduction to propensity score for anesthesiologists
de Cassai, A., Andreatta, G., Boscolo, A., Munari, M., & Navalesi, P. (2020) · Korean Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.4097/kja.20016 · Cited by 6
Wauchope, H., Jones, J. P. G., Amano, T., Geldmann, J., Blanco, D., Fuller, R. A., Langendoen, T., Mundkur, T., Simmons, B., Nagy, S., et al. (2019) · doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.27741v2 · Cited by 6
“Though Mahalanobis distance has been criticized in the past for performing poorly when matching on many covariates (Gu & Rosenbaum, 1993; Stuart 2010), recent criticisms of the most commonly used matching method, Propensity Score Matching (King & Nielsen 2019), meant we were interested to test…”
MethodLee, S.-M., Song, I., Suh, D., Chang, C., & Suh, D.-C. (2018) · Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.7570/jomes.2018.27.4.238 · Cited by 6
Thomsen, F. B., Bosco, C., Garmo, H., Adolfsson, J., Hammar, N., Stattin, P., & Hemelrijck, M. V. (2018) · Acta oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2018.1529427 · Cited by 6
“It provides a better balance of covariates between exposed and unexposed groups compared to other matching strategies in datasets with many covariates [29].”
BackgroundDoes Reducing Case Processing Time Reduce Recidivism? A Study of the Early Case Resolution Court
Butters, R. P., Prince, K. C., Walker, A., Worwood, E. B., & Sarver, C. M. (2018) · Criminal Justice Policy Review · doi:10.1177/0887403418789465 · Cited by 6
“Notably, the use of many-to-one matching has been shown to reduce statistical bias in the estimation of the treatment effect (Cepeda, Boston, Farrar, & Strom, 2003; Gu & Rosenbaum, 1993).”
BackgroundDynamic Effects of Public Investment Support in the Food and Beverage Industries
Špička, J. (2018) · Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics · doi:10.7160/aol.2018.100108 · Cited by 6
“Based on empirical studies that compared various distance metrics (Gu and Rosenbaum, 1993; Rosenbaum, 1989; Rosenbaum and Rubin, 1985), authors decided to use the Mahalanobis Distance within Propensity Score Calipers (no matches outside calipers) as this paper’s distance calculation method since it…”
MethodPan, H.-Y., Li, T., Huang, Z.-G., Yu, H.-B., Kong, D.-L., Ding, Y.-L., Pan, C.-C., & Jiang, Y.-G. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02182-5 · Cited by 6
Solomkin, J., Mullins, C., Quintana, A., Eckmann, C., Shelbaya, A., Ernst, F. R., Krukas, M. R., & Reisman, A. (2016) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2015.075 · Cited by 6
“each quintile to examine outcomes of tigecycline versus other antibiotic therapy [13].”
BackgroundUsing Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Investigations: A Discussion and Illustration
Hosman, C. A., & Gurm, H. (2015) · International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · doi:10.6000/1929-6029.2015.04.02.7 · Cited by 6
“This limitation can be overcome by the use of flexible matching methods like full matching [10,11], which will be discussed in the next section.”
BackgroundWong, K. K., & Socha, T. (2008) · Peabody Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/01619560802418677 · Cited by 6
“To control for a number of demographic variables, we employ the Mahalanobis distance matching to define an appropriate comparison school group before analysis (Xing & Rosenbaum, 1993).”
MethodHerpesviral Keratitis Following COVID-19 Vaccination: Analysis of NHIS Database in Korea
Lee, T. E., Ahn, S. H., Jeong, C. Y., Kim, J. S., & You, I. C. (2024) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000003556 · Cited by 7
EffCause: Discover Dynamic Causal Relationships Efficiently from Time-Series
Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, X., Ma, M., & Wang, P. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3640818 · Cited by 4
Soltantabar, P., Alhadab, A., Hibma, J., Roychoudhury, S., Wang, D. D., Bello, C., & Elmeliegy, M. (2023) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.13049 · Cited by 5
Constructing Matched Groups in Dental Observational Health Disparity Studies for Causal Effects
Cheng, J., Gregorich, S. E., Gansky, S., Fisher-Owens, S. A., Kottek, A., White, J. M., & Mertz, E. (2020) · JDR Clinical & Translational Research · doi:10.1177/2380084419830655 · Cited by 5
“Gu and Rosenbaum (1993) showed that simple NN matching and optimal matching usually end with choosing the same referent group of pediatric patients so that the overall balance is the same, but by assigning them to a different comparison group of pediatric patients, optimal matching performs better…”
BackgroundOverweight Proxies Are Associated with Atopic Asthma: A Matched Case–Control Study
Gramss, M., Lipek, T., Vogel, M., Remmler, J., Hiemisch, A., Jurkutat, A., Genuneit, J., Körner, A., & Kiess, W. (2019) · Hormone Research in Paediatrics · doi:10.1159/000501685 · Cited by 5
Walsh, R., Moore, R., & Doyle, J. (2018) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy012 · Cited by 5
“We chose optimal matching over a greedy algorithm, since studies have shown that optimal matching performs as well as, and often better than, greedy algorithms (Rosenbaum 2005; Gu and Rosenbaum 1993).”
MethodExamining the Correlates of Sex Offender Residence Restriction Violation Rates
Rydberg, J., Grommon, E., Huebner, B. M., & Pleggenkuhle, B. (2016) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10940-016-9303-z · Cited by 6
Annane, D., Mira, J., Ware, L., Gordon, A., Sevransky, J., Stüber, F., Heagerty, P., Wellman, H., Neira, M., Mancini, A. D. J., et al. (2012) · Annals of Intensive Care · doi:10.1186/2110-5820-2-15 · Cited by 5
“Cochran and Rubin found that this leads to excellent bias reduction [37-39].”
BackgroundMethodERROR-FREE MILESTONES IN ERROR PRONE MEASUREMENTS
Small, D. S., & Rosenbaum, P. (2009) · Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/08-aoas233 · Cited by 5
“…full matching—one that minimizes the total distance within matched sets—may be constructed by solving a standard combinatorial optimization problem, technically known as minimum cost flow in a network [Rosenbaum (1991), Gu and Rosenbaum (1993), Hansen (2004, 2007), Hansen and Klopfer (2006)].”
Self-citationSimonson, J., Gordo, L. R., & Kelle, N. (2012) · doi:10.12759/hsr.37.2012.2.185-210 · Cited by 5
Propensity Score Matching to Extract Latent Experiments from Nonexperimental Data: A Case Study
Hansen, B. B. (2011) · Lecture notes in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9389-2_9 · Cited by 7
“Rosenbaum (1991) introduced full matching, Gu and Rosenbaum (1993) did a simulation study of it, and Marcus (2000) made use of it to assess the Head Start compensatory education program.”
MethodAre PhDs winners or losers? Wage premiums for doctoral degrees in private sector employment
Pedersen, H. S. (2015) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9901-y · Cited by 4
Data-driven learning optimal K values for K-nearest neighbour matching in causal inference
Zhang, Y., Xu, T., Cheng, D., Li, J., Liu, L., Xu, Z., & Feng, Z. (2025) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-025-01107-5 · Cited by 3
“The concept of optimal matching involves selecting matches by minimizing a global distance metric across all possible pairs (Gu and Rosenbaum 1993).”
Employment effects of minimum wage indexing: Establishment evidence from Oregon restaurants
Miller, S., Wagner, G. A., & Plemmons, A. (2025) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.13284 · Cited by 4
Kumwichar, P., Thungthong, J., Liabsuetrakul, T., Tachimori, H., Hosozawa, M., Saito, E., Taniguchi, Y., Chongsuvivatwong, V., & Iso, H. (2024) · Global Health Research and Policy · doi:10.1186/s41256-024-00390-x · Cited by 4
“We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) using an optimal matching algorithm [19] for age, sex, underlying diseases, purpose of admission, and health zone regions.”
Covariate Balance for Observational Effectiveness Studies: A Comparison of Matching and Weighting
Kush, J. M., Pas, E. T., Musci, R. J., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2022) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2022.2110545 · Cited by 4
“While optimal matching has been shown to be remove more bias when allowing for a variable number of nearest neighbors (Gu & Rosenbaum, 1993), simulation studies have demonstrated nearest neighbor matching is more effective in reducing covariate imbalance than optimal matching when the untreated to…”
BackgroundMethodMcDonough, I. M., Mayhugh, C., Moore, M. K., Brasfield, M. B., Letang, S. K., Madan, C. R., & Allen, R. S. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12040496 · Cited by 4
“differed in parental history of ADRD, were matched using the nearest neighbor method, which matched the closest control for each treated unit one at a time [61].”
MethodHsu, B., Korda, R., Lindley, R., Douglas, K. A., Naganathan, V., & Jorm, L. R. (2021) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02519-w · Cited by 4
“For each of these patient groups (MI, stroke or HF), we constructed a comparator group matched 3:1 on sex and age for the relevant index patient, sampled by optimal matching with replacement [20].”
MethodBertolo, R., Vittori, M., Cipriani, C., Mariorino, F., Iacovelli, V., Petta, F., Toschi, N., Ferro, M., Panei, M., Travaglia, S., et al. (2021) · Actas Urológicas Españolas · doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2020.09.015 · Cited by 4
Huang, H., Fu, R. H., Vartanian, E. D., Du, J. Y., & Otterburn, D. (2021) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000003627 · Cited by 4
A hierarchical algorithm for multicentric matched cohort study designs
Mayer, B., Tadler, S., Rothenbacher, D., Seeger, J., & Wöhrle, J. (2020) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2020.1808453 · Cited by 4
The value of prophylactic chest tubes in tracheoesophageal fistula repair
Nguyen, M. V. L., Delaplain, P. T., Lim, J. C., Golden, J., & Gayer, C. (2020) · Pediatric surgery international (Print) · doi:10.1007/s00383-020-04664-6 · Cited by 4
“For “optimal” matching, pairs were selected that result in the smallest average absolute distance across all of the matched pairs [10].”
BackgroundWang, X.-Q., Du, X., Yang, H., Bucholz, E., Downing, N. S., Spertus, J., Masoudi, F., Li, J., Guan, W., Gao, Y., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033269 · Cited by 4
Hannan, E., Zhong, Y., Wu, Y., Berger, P., Jacobs, A., Walford, G., Venditti, F. J., Ling, F. S. K., Tamis-Holland, J., & King, S. (2019) · Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions · doi:10.1161/circinterventions.118.007097 · Cited by 4
Ridge Rerandomization: An Experimental Design Strategy in the Presence of CollinearityPreprint
Branson, Z., & Shao, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.04513 · Cited by 4
“However, the Mahalanobis distance is known to perform poorly in matching for observational studies when covariates are not ellipsoidally symmetric, there are strong collinearities among the covariates, or there are many covariates (Gu & Rosenbaum, 1993; Olsen, 1997; Stuart, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodBowen, C., & Liu, F. (2018) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.06763 · Cited by 4
“We used method optimal instead of the default nearest neighbor matching method because optimal matching minimizes the distance between matched pairs more than the nearest neighbor algorithm (Gu & Rosenbaum 1993).”
MethodAn Overview of Statistical Approaches for Comparative Effectiveness Research
Greenhouse, J., Anderson, H., Bridge, J., Libby, A., Valuck, R., & Kelleher, K. (2017) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315159409-8 · Cited by 4
Sim, D., Jeong, M., Cho, K., Ahn, Y., Kim, Y. J., Chae, S., Hong, T., Seong, I., Chae, J., Kim, C., et al. (2013) · Korean Circulation Journal · doi:10.4070/kcj.2013.43.2.100 · Cited by 4
“Peak troponin-I (ng/mL)* 32 (6-79) 35 (5-80) 0.”
McMillan, G., & Lapham, S. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00688.x · Cited by 4
Basic Tools of Multivariate Matching
Rosenbaum, P. R. (2009) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1213-8_8 · Cited by 3
Self-citationKhattri, P., Sayers, R., Singh, K. K., Slapikas, R., Tamang, C., Tamang, D., Sagara, B., & BenYishay, A. (2025) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2025.104657 · Cited by 3
“This makes OFM especially valuable in small samples, where retaining all units is critical for maintaining statistical power and estimating unbiased treatment effects (Gu and Rosenbaum, 1993).”
Cafri, G., Fortin, S., & Austin, P. C. (2024) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802241262527 · Cited by 4
“In addition to these nearest neighbor methods, we also consider optimal pair matching, 13 which uses no caliper and minimizes the average of the pairwise distances of the logit propensity scores.”
Tol, M. C. J. M., Willigenburg, N., Willems, H., Gosens, T., Rasker, A. J., Heetveld, M., Schotanus, M., van Dongen, J. V., Eggen, B., Kormos, M., et al. (2022) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.2340/17453674.2022.4547 · Cited by 3
“If the covariates are unbalanced, different matching methods will be used until balance is obtained (14,15).”
Method2D score-based estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects
Ye, S., Chen, Y.-Z., & Padilla, O. H. M. (2021) · Journal of Causal Inference · doi:10.1515/jci-2022-0016 · Cited by 3
“The exact K-nearest-neighbor matching (Rubin, 1974) is one of the most common, and easiest to implement and understand methods; and ratio matching (Smith, 1997; Rubin and Thomas, 2000; Ming and Rosenbaum, 2001), which finds multiple good matches for each treated individual, performs well when there is a large number o…”
BackgroundAssessing effect heterogeneity of a randomized treatment using conditional inference trees
Venkatasubramaniam, A., Koch, B., Erickson, L., French, S., Vock, D., & Wolfson, J. A. (2019) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802211052831 · Cited by 3
“e are vulnerable to the dimensionality reduction penalty alluded to above; when the number of covariates is large, 0(x;x0;d= ) may be relatively large even if the scalar distance is small (or zero) [20]. The propensity score [21, 22], dened as the probability of receiving the treatment given the observed covariates, i…”
MethodPropensity scores for proxy reports of care experience and quality: are they useful?
Roydhouse, J., Gutman, R., Keating, N., Mor, V., & Wilson, I. (2019) · Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology · doi:10.1007/s10742-019-00205-4 · Cited by 3
“2015) and optimal pair matching (Bertsekas 1991; Gu and Rosenbaum 1993).”
BackgroundAdaptive propensity score procedure improves matching in prospective observational trials
Weber, D., Uhlmann, L., Schönenberger, S., & Kieser, M. (2019) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0763-3 · Cited by 3
“The lack of comparability can be addressed by matching procedures as, for example, Optimal Matching or Propensity Score Matching [3, 4].”
MethodComment mesurer l’efficacité en vie réelle ?
Launois, R., Trouiller, J.-B., & Cabout, E. (2018) · Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises · doi:10.1016/j.pharma.2018.07.003 · Cited by 4
de Almeida, A. N., & Bravo-Ureta, B. (2017) · Studies in Agricultural Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.262424 · Cited by 3
ZaliQL: A SQL-Based Framework for Drawing Causal Inference from Big Data
Salimi, B., & Suciu, D. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03540 · Cited by 3
“The latter is called optimal matching [10].”
BackgroundBaşer, O., BÜrkan, A., Baser, E., Koselerli, R., Ertugay, E., & Altınbaş, A. (2013) · Cardiology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40119-013-0018-z · Cited by 3
“Third, a matched analysis can eliminate noncomparable exposed subjects [35].”
BackgroundGeneralized Propensity Score Matching with Multilevel Treatment Options
Başer, O. (2013) · Journal of health economics and outcomes research · doi:10.36469/9847 · Cited by 3
An Evaluation of Latent Growth Models for Propensity Score Matched Groups
Leite, W., Sandbach, R., Jin, R., MacInnes, J., & Jackman, M. (2012) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2012.687666 · Cited by 3
“Monte Carlo simulation studies about matching indicate that one-to-many matching and variable numbers of matches tend to outperform one-to-one matching in terms of bias reduction, and optimal matching tends to outperform greedy matching ( Cepeda, Boston, Farrar, & Strom, 2003 ; Gu & Rosenbaum, 1993 ).”
BackgroundMethodReiser, V., Porzelius, C., Stampf, S., Schumacher, M. C., & Binder, H. (2012) · Computational Statistics · doi:10.1007/s00180-012-0306-4 · Cited by 3
“To do so, two relevant parameters critically for the success of each matching process have to be considered: ‘distance’ and ‘balance’ (Gu and Rosenbaum 1993).”
BackgroundYang, Y., & DeGruttola, V. G. (2007) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00883.x · Cited by 4
“Matching can also be based on different metrics, such as Euclidean distance, Mahalanobis distance, propensity distance, and Mahalanobis distance within propensity score calipers (Rubin, 1979; Gu and Rosenbaum, 1993).”
BackgroundЭдуардовна, С. Я. (2022) · Social Psychology and Society · doi:10.17759/sps.2022130103 · Cited by 3
“Предварительная подготовка и диагностика данных для мэтчинга Предварительная диагностика данных показала, что распределение переменной уровень образования сильно отклоняется от нормального, что осложняет ее использование для мэтчинга с расстоянием Махаланобиса, который является чувствительным к распределению переменны…”
Spatial and Spatiotemporal Matching Framework for Causal Inference (Short Paper)
Akbari, K., & Tomko, M. (2022) · Conference On Spatial Information Theory · doi:10.4230/lipics.cosit.2022.23 · Cited by 3
Statistics Commentary Series: Commentary No. 30: Propensity Scores.
Streiner, D. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0000000000000991 · Cited by 3
“Even though optimal matching would seem optimal, the results tend to be similar in terms of balancing the groups.(9) The third decision (or rather set of decisions) involves yet another vague term that I have been using: how do we define a “close” match? Yet again, there are two options.”
BackgroundEvaluating selection out of health plans for medicaid beneficiaries with substance abuse
Normand, S., Belanger, A., & Frank, R. (2005) · Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research · doi:10.1007/bf02287814 · Cited by 3
“8 331 (13) 33l (13) 0 1,215 (19) 855 (26) 17.”
Evaluation Strategies in Labor Economics -- An Application to Post-Secondary Education
Augurzky, B. (2000) · doi:10.11588/heidok.00001581 · Cited by 3
The role of Science Parks: a puzzle of growth, innovation and R&D investments
Lamperti, F., Mavilia, R., & Castellini, S. (2015) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9455-2 · Cited by 116
“1), meaning that alternative distance functions, as for the Mahalanobis distance, turn out to not to be appropriated for our context (Gu and Rosenbaum 1993 [23]).”
BackgroundA Survey on Causality with Federated Learning: Challenges, Techniques, and Applications
Deng, J., Chen, H., Jiang, Z.-H., Wong, R. C.-W., & Ngai, E. C. H. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3799419 · Cited by 2
“There are several distance metrics to measure the similarity among units [32], such as Mahalanobis distance [89], Euclidean distance [88], propensity score [23], and so on.”
Yu, R.-X., Zhu, Z.-H., Qin, S.-Z., & Zhang, D. (2026) · Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c11387 · Cited by 2
Wang, Z.-Q., Tilley, S., Peloquin, C., Petrow, E., Clancy, M., & Neogi, T. (2025) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.43441 · Cited by 2
“Additionally, colchicine inhibits NLRP3 in fl ammasome activation, thereby preventing the maturation and release of interleukin-1 β (IL-1 β ) and IL-18, further mitigating in fl ammation.”
Sun, S., Hara, A., Johnstone, L. M., Hallmark, B., Lu, E., Watkins, J. C., Thomson, C. A., Sergeant, S., Sergeant, S., Umans, J., et al. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16172933 · Cited by 2
Utility of real-world evidence in biosimilar development
Arani, R., Wang, J., Pang, D., Sinha, S. B., Uttenreuther-Fischer, M., & Chow, S.-C. (2024) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2024.2330217 · Cited by 2
“The Mahalanobis distance can work quite well when there are relatively few covariates (Amusa et al. 2022; Rubin 1979; Zhao 2004) but it does not perform as well when the covariates are not normally distributed or there are many covariates (Gu and Rosenbaum 1993).”
Bong, S., & Lee, K. (2023) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.18532 · Cited by 2
“Matching methods have been proposed to address the limitations of previous methods in estimating causal effects, and these methods have been well-established in the literature (Rubin, 1973; Rosenbaum, 1989; Gu and Rosenbaum, 1993; Heckman et al., 1998; Abadie and Imbens, 2002).”
MethodAyem, G. T., Ajibesin, A. A., Iorliam, A., & Nsang, A. S. (2023) · International Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s41870-023-01490-6 · Cited by 3
“The PSM algorithm employs the Greedy one-to-one matching technique for each similar (23) instance of the treated to the controlled [63].”
LeBoeuf, L., Goldstein-Greenwood, J., & Lillard, A. S. (2023) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2023.2186991 · Cited by 2
“Propensity score matching (PSM) can be an effective way to reduce bias in treatment-effect estimates when treatment is self-selected or otherwise non-randomly assigned (Gu & Rosenbaum, 1993; Harris & Horst, 2016; Steiner et al., 2015; Stuart, 2010).”
BackgroundAn Improved Matching Practice for Augmenting a Randomized Clinical Trial with External Control
Li, J., Du, Y., Liu, H., & Yi, Y.-Y. (2023) · Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science · doi:10.1007/s43441-023-00497-2 · Cited by 2
Propensity Score Matching with Cross-Classified Data Structures: A Comparison of Methods
Lee, Y., Leite, W. L., & Leroux, A. J. (2023) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2023.2164843 · Cited by 3
“Additionally, even though one-to-one matching is more common in applied research (Thoemmes & Kim, 2011), one-to-many matching has been found to outperform one-to-one matching (Cepeda et al., 2003; Gu & Rosenbaum, 1993).”
BackgroundLiao, J., Wang, E.-K., Isidro, U., Zhu, J., Cousins, D. S., & Navathe, A. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10122510 · Cited by 2
“Reference [23] is cited in the supplementary materials.”
BackgroundCausal inference for data centric engineering
Graham, D. (2022) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.13618 · Cited by 2
“The matching estimator has been used extensively in the literature (see for example Rosenbaum 1989, 1995, 2002, Gu and Rosenbaum 1993, Rubin 1973a,b, 1979, Rubin and Thomas 1992a,b, 1996, 2000, Dehejia and Wahba 1999, Becker and Ichino 2002, Abadie and Imbens 2002).”
MethodWeng, C., Wang, J.-R., Zhao, J.-C., Ma, Y.-K., Huang, B., Yang, Y., Yuan, D., Wang, T.-H., & Chen, X.-Y. (2022) · Journal of Endovascular Therapy · doi:10.1177/15266028221105179 · Cited by 2
“Matching ratios of 1:2 and an optimal approach 19 with minimal average distance were used to create a matched cohort.”
MethodMeloche, C., Seth, M., Madder, R., Kurlander, J. E., Yaser, J., Chattahi, J., Collins, J., Lingam, N., Arora, D. S., Gurm, H., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.013 · Cited by 2
“We sought to evaluate the association between a history of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and outcomes after PCI.”
MethodJreich, R., & Sebastien, B. (2021) · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10543406.2021.1918140 · Cited by 2
Effect of Tourniquet Use During Surgical Treatment of Open Fractures
Gitajn, I., Werth, P., Sprague, S., Bzovsky, S., Petrisor, B., Jeray, K., O'Hara, N., Bhandari, M., & Slobogean, G. (2021) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.20.01458 · Cited by 2
Better experimental design by hybridizing binary matching with imbalance optimization
Krieger, A., Azriel, D., & Kapelner, A. (2020) · Canadian journal of statistics · doi:10.1002/cjs.11685 · Cited by 2
Discovering context specific causal relationships
Ma, S., Li, J., Liu, L., & Le, T. D. (2018) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-184010 · Cited by 2
“Various distance measure, e.g. Minkowski distance and Mahalanobis distance, can be used for the stratification, but most of them does not perform well when there are many covariates under study [9].”
Mullins, C., Ernst, F. R., Krukas, M. R., Solomkin, J., Eckmann, C., Shelbaya, A., Quintana, A., & Reisman, A. (2016) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.10.013 · Cited by 2
Improving Covariate Balance in 2^K Factorial Designs via Rerandomization
Branson, Z., Dasgupta, T., & Rubin, D. (2015) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.01973 · Cited by 2
“va = 2 p γ(p2 + 1, a2) γ(p2 , a2) , (9)”
BackgroundThe impact of grants in the agriculture sector in Albania: a counterfactual approach
Preka, O. (2014) · AMS Dottorato Institutional Doctoral Theses Repository (University of Bologna) · doi:10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/6716 · Cited by 2
Nguyen-Hoang, P., Yeung, R., & Bogin, A. (2014) · doi:10.1177/1091142113482570 · Cited by 2
Zahid, A., Kamiran, F., Abbas, S., Qureshi, B., & Karim, A. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3557468 · Cited by 2
“This observation is consistent with previous studies [84, e.g.].”
Design of Retrospective and Case-Control Studies in Oncology
Panageas, K., Goldman, D. A., & Kingham, T. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71324-3_9 · Cited by 2
Methods and Biostatistics in Oncology
Jo, R. A., & Riechelmann, R. (2018) · Cambridge International Law Journal · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71324-3 · Cited by 2
Gebauer, R. (2012) · Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · doi:10.12759/hsr.37.2012.2.139-152 · Cited by 2
Kontokosta, C. E. (2015) · Journal of Housing and the Built Environment · doi:10.1007/s10901-014-9430-5 · Cited by 1
Friedlander, A., Oren, S., Sinai, D., Bitan, D., Yoffe, R., Eitan, R., & Lichtenberg, P. (2026) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117263 · Cited by 1
Does Inflation Targeting Enhance Economic Performance? Evidence From Asian Economies
Sethi, C., & Mishra, B. R. (2026) · International Journal of Finance & Economics · doi:10.1002/ijfe.70211 · Cited by 1
Diltz, Z. R., Nguyen, A. Q., Wang, C., Liu, J. W., Sullivan, T. C., Lambert, B., & Saifi, C. (2026) · Journal of Neurosurgery : Spine · doi:10.3171/2025.12.spine25700 · Cited by 1
Maisonneuve, E., Luxi, N., Bellitto, C., Ciccimarra, F., Raethke, M., van Hunsel, F., Lieber, T., Mulder, E., Riefolo, F., Villalobos, F., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Drug Safety and Regulation · doi:10.3389/fdsfr.2025.1689349 · Cited by 1
“Women vaccinated during pregnancy were then 1:4 matched to non-pregnant women on the basis of their PS value, using the nearest neighbor matching procedure (Gu and Rosenbaum, 1993).”
Deng, X., Lu, N., Xie, D., Li, H., & Wang, H.-C. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0335453 · Cited by 1
Hossain, M. A., Hossain, K. K., & Joshi, N. P. (2025) · GM crops & food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2025.2560698 · Cited by 3
“34 This research employed PSM to reduce selection bias in observational data by simulating random treatment assignment through the pairing of treated and control groups.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, X. S., & Rosenbaum, P. R.
- Affiliations
- C.S. First Boston Hong Kong, Ltd.
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- ORCID
- Rosenbaum, Paul R.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 405-420
- ISSN
- 1061-8600 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2715
- OpenAlex
- W2030614017
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- optimal matching, greedy matching, pair matching, covariate balance, distance measures, observational studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review