The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimating Mixture of Dirichlet Process Models
Abstract
Current Gibbs sampling schemes in mixture of Dirichlet process (MDP) models are restricted to using “conjugate” base measures that allow analytic evaluation of the transition probabilities when resampling configurations, or alternatively need to rely on approximate numeric evaluations of some transition probabilities. Implementation of Gibbs sampling in more general MDP models is an open and important problem because most applications call for the use of nonconjugate base measures. In this article we propose a conceptual framework for computational strategies. This framework provides a perspective on current methods, facilitates comparisons between them, and leads to several new methods that expand the scope of MDP models to nonconjugate situations. We discuss one in detail. The basic strategy is based on expanding the parameter vector, and is applicable for MDP models with arbitrary base measure and likelihood. Strategies are also presented for the important class of normal-normal MDP models and for problems with fixed or few hyperparameters. The proposed algorithms are easily implemented and illustrated with an application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes
Teh, Y. W., Jordan, M. I., Beal, M. J., & Blei, D. M. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000302 · Cited by 2,120
A statistical approach for identifying differential distributions in single-cell RNA-seq experiments
Korthauer, K. D., Chu, L.-F., Newton, M. A., Li, Y., Thomson, J., Stewart, R., & Kendziorski, C. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1077-y · Cited by 273
Dirichlet process mixture models for unsupervised clustering of symptoms in Parkinson's disease
White, N., Johnson, H., Silburn, P., & Mengersen, K. (2012) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2012.710897 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Maceachern, S. N., & Müller, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-238
- ISSN
- 1061-8600 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2715
- OpenAlex
- W2062882942
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Mixture of Dirichlet Process Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10618600.1998.10474772
- The paper
- Maceachern, S. N., & Müller, P. (1998). Estimating Mixture of Dirichlet Process Models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.1998.10474772
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.