Cited by 3Art Education and DevelopmentCreativity in Education and NeuroscienceDiverse Music Education Insights

Creative diversity, artistic valuing, and the peaceable imagination.

Best, Harold M.·1994·Arts Education Policy Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10632913.1994.9936380

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Best, H. M.
Affiliations
Wheaton College - Illinois (US)
Corresponding author
Best, Harold M.
Venue
Arts Education Policy Review
Published
1994-06
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
2-8
ISSN
  • 1063-2913 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-4395
OpenAlex
W2043642049
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Arts Education Policy Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
Keywords
creative diversity, art education, diversity in the arts, peace education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review